AWARE SYSTEMS
TIFF and LibTiff Mail List Archive

Thread

2000.10.04 16:24 "PHOTOMETRIC_YCBCR", by Raj Kumar S.
2000.10.04 16:17 "Re: PHOTOMETRIC_YCBCR", by Martin Bailey
2000.10.04 16:34 "Re: PHOTOMETRIC_YCBCR", by Rex Jolliff
2000.10.04 18:54 "Re: PHOTOMETRIC_YCBCR", by Raj Kumar S.
2000.10.04 18:19 "Re: PHOTOMETRIC_YCBCR", by Helge Blischke
2000.10.04 20:58 "Re: PHOTOMETRIC_YCBCR", by Rex Jolliff
2000.10.04 22:25 "Re: PHOTOMETRIC_YCBCR", by Joris Van Damme
2000.10.05 04:05 "Re: PHOTOMETRIC_YCBCR", by Niles Ritter
2000.10.05 17:54 "Re: PHOTOMETRIC_YCBCR", by Raj Kumar S.
2000.10.05 18:25 "Re: PHOTOMETRIC_YCBCR", by Andy
2000.10.05 18:41 "Re: PHOTOMETRIC_YCBCR", by Thad Humphries
2000.10.06 02:21 "Re: PHOTOMETRIC_YCBCR", by Tom Lane
2000.10.05 18:43 "RE: PHOTOMETRIC_YCBCR", by Chris Losinger
2000.10.05 19:53 "Re: PHOTOMETRIC_YCBCR", by Rex Jolliff
2000.10.05 21:02 "Re: PHOTOMETRIC_YCBCR", by Tim Bell
2000.10.06 04:18 "Re: PHOTOMETRIC_YCBCR", by Raj Kumar S.

2000.10.05 17:54 "Re: PHOTOMETRIC_YCBCR", by Raj Kumar S.

It looks like the Imaging for Windows product that Microsoft is giving away is STILL producing those bogus JPEG-in-TIFF files.

i know a little bit of C. but pretty new to TIFF and graphic file formats. is it possible to write a small utility to convert these nasty MS TIFFs to some thing neat and standard complaint. if some one can give me some guidance and a starting point to understand TIFF i can give it a try.

I tried to convince them to change it a while back when it was still called the Wang Imaging for Windows product, but I guess they didn't listen.

may be this was intentional. if i were some one who was not able to find out a solution by myself, then the only option was to purchase a copy of Windows.

no wonder it is the largest selling OS.

raj