2017.11.30 15:44 "Re: [Tiff] Switching to gitlab ?", by

2017.11.30 15:44 "Re: [Tiff] Switching to gitlab ?", by

On 2017-11-30 15:26, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:

> On Thu, 30 Nov 2017, Even Rouault wrote:
>>> I think that
>>> any future development commits should be to Gitlab. One final commit
>>> should be made to CVS to document that the content there is now
>>> frozen.
>> I was thinking to just decomission the CVS repository (have to find
>> out how to do that exctly),
>> or rename it to some libtiff_historical name. That way, people won't
>> pull from a deprecated
>> repo

> The repository itself does contain some other useful historical things > besides libtiff such as a version of libjpeg which supports multiple

> depths in the same build. It would be wrong to just turn off the > server.

We could do git conversions for them as well, and stick them in a "historical" section in gitlab if you like. This would preserve the full history.

If you would like this doing, could you give me a list of CVS modules which need converting? I can't checkout the full set because not all the modules on the CVS server are public, so the checkout fails.