2017.12.01 14:00 "[Tiff] Removing the "mike" branch", by

2017.12.01 14:24 "Re: [Tiff] Removing the "mike" branch", by

On 2017-12-01 14:09, Even Rouault wrote:

On vendredi 1 décembre 2017 14:00:11 CET rleigh@codelibre.net wrote:

Would anyone object to removing the "mike" branch (https://gitlab.com/libtiff/libtiff/tree/mike)? The commit contains no content other than CVS IDs getting updated for the branch number

> (https://gitlab.com/libtiff/libtiff/commit/92e21237f4dfd043a7d407e5e2b4e2812 > 1b6f450). It was never used in CVS, and was carried over to git as an empty

branch (other than the ID updates).

+1 for removing it

Thanks, I've done so. Looking at the git tags, there are also some dubious tags, including:


Could any of these be deleted? orig looks like a tag for the original import into CVS, but was actually on the "mike" branch so isn't actually tagging the original import. The Release tags ending in hyphens look like mistakes or typos--they aren't tagging actual releases at all. Pre360 is before the beta release tag, so not sure if this has any purpose.