AWARE SYSTEMS
TIFF and LibTiff Mail List Archive

Thread

2011.12.12 20:22 "[Tiff] considering packaging 4.0 beta in debian "unstable"", by Jay Berkenbilt
2011.12.12 20:33 "Re: [Tiff] considering packaging 4.0 beta in debian "unstable"", by Bob Friesenhahn
2011.12.12 21:26 "Re: [Tiff] considering packaging 4.0 beta in debian "unstable"", by Jay Berkenbilt
2011.12.12 23:49 "Re: [Tiff] considering packaging 4.0 beta in debian "unstable"", by Chris Cox
2011.12.13 00:16 "Re: [Tiff] considering packaging 4.0 beta in debian "unstable"", by Bob Friesenhahn
2011.12.13 00:29 "Re: [Tiff] considering packaging 4.0 beta in debian "unstable"", by Frank Warmerdam
2011.12.13 01:13 "Re: [Tiff] considering packaging 4.0 beta in debian "unstable"", by Lee Howard
2011.12.13 14:42 "Re: [Tiff] considering packaging 4.0 beta in debian "unstable"", by Olivier Paquet
2011.12.13 02:06 "Re: [Tiff] considering packaging 4.0 beta in debian "unstable"", by Bob Friesenhahn
2011.12.14 21:35 "Re: [Tiff] considering packaging 4.0 beta in debian "unstable"", by Jay Berkenbilt

2011.12.13 02:06 "Re: [Tiff] considering packaging 4.0 beta in debian "unstable"", by Bob Friesenhahn

On Mon, 12 Dec 2011, Frank Warmerdam wrote:

I am fine with release 4.0.0 as is. Bob, are you willing to do the legwork on this? I'm never confident of my versions of the autoutils.

Of course.

Some security folks within Google will likely do a security audit of libtiff4 in the next couple months but any corresponding changes can go into 4.0.1.

Hopefully they will submit good patches.

Bob
--
Bob Friesenhahn
bfriesen@simple.dallas.tx.us, http://www.simplesystems.org/users/bfriesen/
GraphicsMagick Maintainer, http://www.GraphicsMagick.org/