- 2004.05.27 07:30 "Re: [Tiff] large TIFF - two alternatives", by Andrey Kiselev
- 2004.05.27 09:25 "Re: [Tiff] large TIFF - two alternatives", by Rob van den Tillaart
-
2004.05.27 10:43 "Re: [Tiff] large TIFF - two alternatives", by John Aldridge
- 2004.05.27 12:49 "Re: [Tiff] large TIFF - two alternatives", by Andrey Kiselev
- 2004.05.27 13:05 "Re: [Tiff] large TIFF - two alternatives", by Frank Warmerdam
- 2004.05.27 18:31 "Re: [Tiff] large TIFF - two alternatives", by Chris Cox
- 2004.06.01 11:50 "Re: [Tiff] large TIFF - two alternatives", by John Aldridge
- 2004.05.27 16:37 "Re: [Tiff] large TIFF - two alternatives", by Frank Warmerdam
- 2004.06.04 13:31 "RE: [Tiff] large TIFF - two alternatives", by Ed Grissom
- 2004.06.09 20:33 "[Tiff] Re: large TIFF - two alternatives", by Steve Carlsen
2004.05.27 19:15 "Re: [Tiff] large TIFF - two alternatives", by Frank Warmerdam
Would it be helpful for the libtiff team to go ahead with prototype implementation of the new format for "test driving"?
Yes (in a branch, of course!).
Chris,
OK, I have asked Andrey to work on this when he has a chance.
I am personally very in favor of specification documents developed concurrently with a couple of interoperable implementations of the specification.
The best idea would probably be setting up a TWIKI site to keep an ongoing list of differences from the TIFF 6 spec, and include any implementation issues we come across. I'm not sure if we'd want it fully public or private.
I think this is an excellent idea. I will look into getting Twiki enabled on libtiff.maptools.org. It is already installed there for other hosted projects.
Best regards,
---------------------------------------+--------------------------------------
I set the clouds in motion - turn up | Frank Warmerdam, warmerdam@pobox.com
light and sound - activate the windows | http://pobox.com/~warmerdam
and watch the world go round - Rush | Geospatial Programmer for Rent