AWARE SYSTEMS
TIFF and LibTiff Mail List Archive

Thread

2004.05.27 01:15 "[Tiff] large TIFF - two alternatives", by Steve Carlsen
2004.05.27 07:30 "Re: [Tiff] large TIFF - two alternatives", by Andrey Kiselev
2004.05.27 15:02 "Re: [Tiff] large TIFF - two alternatives", by Steve Carlsen
2004.05.27 09:25 "Re: [Tiff] large TIFF - two alternatives", by Rob van den Tillaart
2004.05.27 14:00 "Re: [Tiff] large TIFF - two alternatives", by Steve Carlsen
2004.05.27 10:43 "Re: [Tiff] large TIFF - two alternatives", by John Aldridge
2004.05.27 12:49 "Re: [Tiff] large TIFF - two alternatives", by Andrey Kiselev
2004.05.27 13:05 "Re: [Tiff] large TIFF - two alternatives", by Frank Warmerdam
2004.05.27 18:31 "Re: [Tiff] large TIFF - two alternatives", by Chris Cox
2004.06.01 11:50 "Re: [Tiff] large TIFF - two alternatives", by John Aldridge
2004.06.01 15:46 "Re: [Tiff] large TIFF - two alternatives", by Steve Carlsen
2004.06.01 16:27 "RE: [Tiff] large TIFF - two alternatives", by Ed Grissom
2004.06.02 14:20 "RE: [Tiff] large TIFF - two alternatives", by Steve Carlsen
2004.06.03 06:40 "Re: [Tiff] large TIFF - two alternatives", by Rob van den Tillaart
2004.05.27 16:37 "Re: [Tiff] large TIFF - two alternatives", by Frank Warmerdam
2004.05.27 18:41 "Re: [Tiff] large TIFF - two alternatives", by Chris Cox
2004.05.27 19:15 "Re: [Tiff] large TIFF - two alternatives", by Frank Warmerdam
2004.06.04 13:31 "RE: [Tiff] large TIFF - two alternatives", by Ed Grissom
2004.06.04 14:01 "Re: [Tiff] large TIFF - two alternatives", by Frank Warmerdam
2004.06.04 15:03 "RE: [Tiff] large TIFF - two alternatives", by Ed Grissom
2004.06.09 20:33 "[Tiff] Re: large TIFF - two alternatives", by Steve Carlsen
2004.06.10 07:37 "Re: [Tiff] Re: large TIFF - two alternatives", by Rob van den Tillaart
2004.06.10 20:41 "Re: [Tiff] Re: large TIFF - two alternatives", by Chris Cox
2004.06.10 21:11 "Re: [Tiff] Re: large TIFF - two alternatives", by Phillip Crews

2004.05.27 10:43 "Re: [Tiff] large TIFF - two alternatives", by John Aldridge

The second alternative is the way I would design TIFF if I were doing it over again today, taking advantage of the fact that no old TIFF readers will be able to read "Large TIFF" files anyway, even with the minimal approach.

This is a serious question, and not intended as a flame: if I need to support a new file format to get >2/4GB support, why wouldn't I just use PNG?

John