Thread

2001.04.26 14:40 "8K chunks for RowsPerStrip?", by Michael O'Rourke

2001.04.26 16:13 "RE: 8K chunks for RowsPerStrip?", by Max Martinez

2001.04.26 16:45 "RE: 8K chunks for RowsPerStrip?", by Don Swatman

2001.04.26 18:12 "RE: 8K chunks for RowsPerStrip?", by Ed Grissom

2001.04.26 18:39 "Re: 8K chunks for RowsPerStrip?", by Frank Warmerdam

2001.04.26 16:47 "Re: 8K chunks for RowsPerStrip?", by Bernd Stahlbock

2001.04.26 17:19 "Re: 8K chunks for RowsPerStrip?", by Daniel McCoy

2001.04.26 18:34 "8K chunks for RowsPerStrip?", by Chris Barker

2001.04.26 18:48 "RE: 8K chunks for RowsPerStrip? - Image size limits", by Peter Smith

2001.04.26 14:40 "8K chunks for RowsPerStrip?", by Michael O'Rourke

Does this standard still apply? I end up seeing _lots_ of TIFF files that write out one strip. Seems like this standard/suggestion (per Section 7 of the spec) was probably meant more for days when machines didn't have much ram and swap space.

I've also noticed that most apps I can find have no trouble reading one strip images and one strip images, of course, have better compression. Sometimes _significantly_ better compression.

Thanks,

Michael