- 2007.09.12 15:01 "Re: [Tiff] SIZEOF_UNSIGNED_LONG", by Frank Warmerdam
- 2007.09.19 13:23 "[Tiff] New Beta Cut?", by Frank Warmerdam
- 2007.09.20 21:03 "[Tiff] libtiff4, and the size of STRIPOFFSETs and TILEOFFSETs", by Frank Warmerdam
- 2007.10.18 14:47 "Re: [Tiff] linking in MS Visual Studio 2005", by Jason Tillett
2007.09.12 13:04 "Re: [Tiff] SIZEOF_UNSIGNED_LONG", by Edward Lam
Ooops, sorry, I didn't mean to send that. Here's what I really meant to comment on.
> I wonder if we should either:
> o Require that SIZEOF_UNSIGNED_LONG be explicitly 8 or 4, and if it is not
> defined we #error to stop the build.
What about just erroring if it's not defined? ie.
#ifndef SIZEOF_UNSIGNED_LONG
#error SIZEOF_UNSIGED_LONG needs to be defined
#endif
-Edward
libtiff now (I'm not clear on how recent this is) checks SIZEOF_UNSIGNED_LONG in tif_fax3.c and has an alternate form of the FILL() macro for 64bit systems. This introduced a bug in GDAL which didn't declare the SIZEOF_UNSIGNED_LONG macro when doing "libtiff internal" builds on 64bit systems.
Er, what happened to the SIZEOF_LONG macro? I'm still using 3.7.0 though.