2006.04.19 10:45 "[Tiff] TIFF + Group4 will last 10 years?", by Rui Castro
-
2006.04.19 11:40 "Re: [Tiff] TIFF + Group4 will last 10 years?", by Leonard Rosenthol
-
2006.04.19 19:26 "[Tiff] Re: Tiff Digest, Vol 23, Issue 17", by Glenn Widener
-
2006.04.19 21:03 "Re: [Tiff] PDF/A vs. TIFF", by Leonard Rosenthol
- 2006.04.19 21:22 "Re: [Tiff] PDF/A vs. TIFF", by Bob Friesenhahn
- 2006.04.20 07:30 "Re: [Tiff] PDF/A vs. TIFF", by Brad Hards
-
2006.04.19 21:03 "Re: [Tiff] PDF/A vs. TIFF", by Leonard Rosenthol
-
2006.04.19 19:26 "[Tiff] Re: Tiff Digest, Vol 23, Issue 17", by Glenn Widener
- 2006.04.19 11:49 "Re: [Tiff] TIFF + Group4 will last 10 years?", by Rocky Pulley
- 2006.04.19 12:40 "Re: [Tiff] TIFF + Group4 will last 10 years?", by Gerben Vos
2006.04.19 23:34 "Re: [Tiff] PDF/A vs. TIFF", by Graeme Gill
100 years from now someone comes across a storage device containing two documents - one in PDF/A and one in TIFF. There are no current "software" products that can read either format, and so one must be written from specification. ASSUMING that the specifications/standard documents are available - which would be easier to implement from scratch WITH NO REFERENCE IMPLEMENTATION.
Hmm. Having reverse engineered a few file formats in my time, if I stumbled across a raster file or a PDL file that I wanted to read, I know which one I'd choose - the one with the pixels.
Graeme Gill.