
Thread
2007.03.25 17:21 "[Tiff] Re: [Gdal-dev] gdaladdo throwing errors", by Seth Price
Great! It looks like this update to libtiff solved the most problems. It's complaining about thrashing now, but I don't know if I need to worry about that bit.
$ /usr/local/bin/gdaladdo --debug on -r nearest test.tif 2 4 8 16 32 GTiff: Opened 10800x10800 overview.
GTiff: Opened 5400x5400 overview.
GTiff: Opened 3600x3600 overview.
GTiff: Opened 1800x1800 overview.
GTiff: Opened 900x900 overview.
GTiff: Opened 450x450 overview.
GTiff: Opened 225x225 overview.
GDAL: GDALOpen(test.tif) succeeds as GTiff.
0GDAL: Potential thrashing on band 1 of test.tif. GDAL: Potential thrashing on band 1 of.
GDAL: Potential thrashing on band 1 of. .GDAL: Potential thrashing on band 1 of.
.GDAL: Potential thrashing on band 1 of. .10.GDAL: Potential thrashing on band 1 of.
[...]
Thanks,
Seth
On Mar 25, 2007, at 11:28 AM, William Kyngesburye wrote:
> (sorry, once more)
>
> I looked at the libtiff page, a note was added rectly, to get a
> stable cvs, checkout a certain branch:
>
> cvs checkout -r branch-3-9 libtiff
>
> On Mar 25, 2007, at 10:57 AM, Seth Price wrote:
>
I haven't tried your frameworks, but I may look into them. If I'm only using UNIXy utilities, are there any advantages?
>> CVS HEAD isn't compiling for me. What follows is a massive dump
from ./configure && make:
>> (maybe I should post this on the libtiff list?)
>>
>
> -----
> William Kyngesburye <kyngchaos@kyngchaos.com>
> http://www.kyngchaos.com/
>
> "Time is an illusion - lunchtime doubly so."
>
> - Ford Prefect
>
>
>
>