AWARE SYSTEMS
TIFF and LibTiff Mail List Archive

Thread

2001.10.03 19:05 "OJPEG & Wang Images (long)", by Scott Marovich
2001.10.04 22:42 "Re: OJPEG & Wang Images (long)", by Tim Bell
2001.10.05 02:21 "Re: OJPEG & Wang Images (long)", by Joris Van Damme
2001.10.05 03:16 "Re: OJPEG & Wang Images (long)", by Niles Ritter
2001.10.05 13:00 "Re: OJPEG & Wang Images (long)", by Leonard Rosenthol
2001.10.05 18:58 "Re: OJPEG & Wang Images (long)", by Joris Van Damme
2001.10.05 19:43 "Re: OJPEG & Wang Images (long)", by Leonard Rosenthol
2001.10.05 19:44 "Re: OJPEG & Wang Images (long)", by Joris Van Damme
2001.10.08 02:54 "Re: OJPEG & Wang Images (long)", by Graeme Gill
2001.10.05 17:00 "Re: OJPEG & Wang Images (long)", by Tore Bostrup
2001.10.05 17:46 "Re: OJPEG & Wang Images (long)", by Joris Van Damme
2001.10.05 18:50 "Re: OJPEG & Wang Images (long)", by Tore Bostrup
2001.10.05 18:54 "Re: OJPEG & Wang Images (long)", by Joris Van Damme
2001.10.05 21:21 "Re: OJPEG & Wang Images (long)", by Ross Finlayson
2001.12.02 16:28 "Re: OJPEG & Wang Images (long)", by Jon Saxton
2001.12.02 22:30 "Re: OJPEG & Wang Images (long)", by Tom Lane

2001.10.05 18:50 "Re: OJPEG & Wang Images (long)", by Tore Bostrup

That's a religious discussion. The fact of the matter is that it is out there, however unfortunate and/or non-standard that may be.

I'm not in complete disagreement, I just wanted to point out that releasing a new standard (in this case TIFF 7.0) doesn't really solve the problem that the format is in use and "pretends" to be standard - at least not in the foreseeable future.


Editor's note: This mail was not originally archived, and has been reconstructed from quotes.