2021.05.02 00:36 "[Tiff] SIMD optimizations", by Larry Bank
-
2021.05.02 09:48 "Re: [Tiff] SIMD optimizations", by Even Rouault
- 2021.05.02 10:33 "Re: [Tiff] SIMD optimizations", by ZdPo Ster
-
2021.05.02 13:55 "Re: [Tiff] SIMD optimizations", by Bob Friesenhahn
-
2021.05.02 14:09 "Re: [Tiff] SIMD optimizations", by Even Rouault
-
2021.05.02 15:35 "Re: [Tiff] SIMD optimizations", by Larry Bank
- 2021.05.02 17:20 "Re: [Tiff] SIMD optimizations", by Even Rouault
- 2021.05.03 15:58 "Re: [Tiff] SIMD optimizations", by Even Rouault
-
2021.05.03 19:16 "Re: [Tiff] SIMD optimizations", by Jeff Breidenbach
-
2021.05.03 20:40 "Re: [Tiff] SIMD optimizations", by Bob Friesenhahn
- 2021.05.03 21:09 "Re: [Tiff] SIMD optimizations", by Even Rouault
- 2021.05.03 21:44 "Re: [Tiff] SIMD optimizations", by Larry Bank
- 2021.05.03 22:50 "Re: [Tiff] SIMD optimizations", by Akira Urushibata
-
2021.05.03 20:40 "Re: [Tiff] SIMD optimizations", by Bob Friesenhahn
-
2021.05.02 15:35 "Re: [Tiff] SIMD optimizations", by Larry Bank
-
2021.05.02 14:09 "Re: [Tiff] SIMD optimizations", by Even Rouault
2021.05.02 14:09 "Re: [Tiff] SIMD optimizations", by Even Rouault
The libtiff utilities are mostly not very useful for performance testing since they do something different than common usages.
Agreed. For my benchmarking, I just did a quicky&dirty test program that just calls TIFFReadEncodedTile on all tiles of the file, and repeat that a few times to have timings of a few seconds. That's the minimum overhead scenario.
Was on a Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-10750H CPU @ 2.60GHz, cache 12 MB
http://www.spatialys.com
My software is free, but my time generally not.