Thread

2007.10.22 17:40 "[Tiff] bad version number 10752", by Kai-Uwe Behrmann

2007.10.22 18:31 "Re: [Tiff] bad version number 10752", by Bob Friesenhahn

2007.10.22 18:50 "Re: [Tiff] bad version number 10752", by Kai-Uwe Behrmann

2007.10.22 18:57 "Re: [Tiff] bad version number 10752", by Bob Friesenhahn

2007.10.23 15:05 "Re: [Tiff] bad version number 10752", by Kai-Uwe Behrmann

2007.10.23 15:45 "Re: [Tiff] bad version number 10752", by Bob Friesenhahn

2007.10.22 20:07 "Re: [Tiff] bad version number 10752", by Toby Thain

2007.10.23 02:33 "Re: [Tiff] bad version number 10752", by Graeme Gill

2007.10.23 06:28 "Re: [Tiff] bad version number 10752", by Kai-Uwe Behrmann

2007.10.23 07:41 "Re: [Tiff] bad version number 10752", by Graeme Gill

2007.10.23 08:10 "Re: [Tiff] bad version number 10752", by John

2007.10.23 06:28 "Re: [Tiff] bad version number 10752", by Kai-Uwe Behrmann

Am 23.10.07, 12:33 +1000 schrieb Graeme Gill:

Or better yet, access file data using endian independent code, avoiding the need for compile or run time endian checking.

Reads elegant. What would you suggest?