AWARE [SYSTEMS]
AWare Systems, , Home TIFF and LibTiff Mailing List Archive

LibTiff Mailing List

TIFF and LibTiff Mailing List Archive
June 2005

Previous Thread
Next Thread

Previous by Thread
Next by Thread

Previous by Date
Next by Date

Contact

The TIFF Mailing List Homepage
Archive maintained by AWare Systems



New Datamatrix section



Valid HTML 4.01!



Thread

2005.06.02 20:50 "vb port soon available", by <melser.anton@gmail.com>
2005.06.02 21:00 "Re: vb port soon available", by Edward Lam
2005.06.03 06:04 "Re: vb port soon available", by Andrey Kiselev
2005.06.03 08:18 "Re: vb port soon available", by <melser.anton@gmail.com>
2005.06.03 17:10 "Re: vb port soon available", by <melser.anton@gmail.com>
2005.06.03 17:36 "Re: vb port soon available", by Edward Lam
2005.06.03 06:10 "Re: vb port soon available", by Andrey Kiselev

2005.06.03 17:36 "Re: vb port soon available", by Edward Lam

Hi Antoine,

What happens if the same #define if we want it to be different things for 
different libraries? Witness the problems we already have with the int8, int16, 
etc typedefs. That would be my reason making sure the defines have the word TIFF 
in them.

Does the __stdcall attribute need to be in between the return type and the 
function name? Ew. :) If that is the case, I wouldn't bother with some sort of 
DLL_API define as that's not needed right now anyhow.

-Edward