-
2021.03.01 17:11 "Re: [Tiff] TIFF and multispectral images of historical documents?", by John
-
2021.03.01 17:30 "Re: [Tiff] TIFF and multispectral images of historical documents?", by Vincent Ripoll
-
2021.03.02 06:41 "Re: [Tiff] TIFF and multispectral images of historical documents?", by Andreas Romeyke
-
2021.03.02 09:43 "Re: [Tiff] TIFF and multispectral images of historical documents?", by Vincent Ripoll
-
2021.03.02 10:58 "[Tiff] [Off Topic] TIFF and multispectral images of historical documents?", by Andreas Romeyke
-
2021.03.02 12:20 "Re: [Tiff] [Off Topic] TIFF and multispectral images of historical documents?", by Leonard Rosenthol
- 2021.03.02 14:18 "Re: [Tiff] [Off Topic] TIFF and multispectral images of historical documents?", by Bob Friesenhahn
-
2021.03.02 14:45 "Re: [Tiff] [Off Topic] TIFF and multispectral images of historical documents?", by Roger Leigh
-
2021.03.02 17:38 "Re: [Tiff] [Off Topic] TIFF and multispectral images of historical documents?", by Andrew Brooks
-
2021.03.02 19:03 "Re: [Tiff] [Off Topic] TIFF trademark", by Roger Leigh
- 2021.03.02 19:07 "Re: [Tiff] [Off Topic] TIFF trademark", by Scott Ribe
- 2021.03.02 20:56 "Re: [Tiff] [Off Topic] TIFF trademark", by Leonard Rosenthol
- 2021.03.02 21:52 "Re: [Tiff] [Off Topic] TIFF trademark", by Bob Friesenhahn
- 2021.03.03 05:48 "Re: [Tiff] [Off Topic] TIFF trademark", by William Bader
- 2021.03.12 18:32 "Re: [Tiff] [Off Topic] TIFF and multispectral images of historical documents?", by Leonard Rosenthol
-
2021.03.02 19:03 "Re: [Tiff] [Off Topic] TIFF trademark", by Roger Leigh
-
2021.03.02 17:38 "Re: [Tiff] [Off Topic] TIFF and multispectral images of historical documents?", by Andrew Brooks
-
2021.03.02 12:20 "Re: [Tiff] [Off Topic] TIFF and multispectral images of historical documents?", by Leonard Rosenthol
-
2021.03.02 10:58 "[Tiff] [Off Topic] TIFF and multispectral images of historical documents?", by Andreas Romeyke
- 2021.03.02 12:14 "Re: [Tiff] TIFF and multispectral images of historical documents?", by Leonard Rosenthol
-
2021.03.02 09:43 "Re: [Tiff] TIFF and multispectral images of historical documents?", by Vincent Ripoll
-
2021.03.02 06:41 "Re: [Tiff] TIFF and multispectral images of historical documents?", by Andreas Romeyke
-
2021.03.01 17:30 "Re: [Tiff] TIFF and multispectral images of historical documents?", by Vincent Ripoll
- 2021.03.02 21:37 "Re: [Tiff] Tiff Digest, Vol 28, Issue 1", by Richard Nolde
2021.03.02 14:45 "Re: [Tiff] [Off Topic] TIFF and multispectral images of historical documents?", by Roger Leigh
It should also be noted that the OME-TIFF people are in violation of Adobe’s Trademark on the use of TIFF, so I personally wouldn’t bet on a horse that hadn’t gotten its licenses in order…
While I no longer work for the OME organisation myself, I would be interested to know what exactly would be wrong with the licensing here. I can always pass along any concerns you have to the people I know who are working there.
OME-TIFF is not a trademark or as far as I’m aware infringing on the TIFF trademark. The actual code, both Java and C++ implementations, are BSD-licenced and freely available, as is the open specification.
OME-TIFF is just a plain baseline TIFF or BigTIFF with an XML metadata block in the ImageDescription. The name just means “OME” metadata model inside a “TIFF” container, to differentiate it from the original OME-XML which was OME metadata serialised entirely as XML. Future variants might be for example OME-HDF5 or OME-Zarr. The “-TIFF” suffix is a purely functional description of a TIFF-based file format. Why is that problematic?
Regards,
Roger