AWARE [SYSTEMS]
AWare Systems, , Home TIFF and LibTiff Mailing List Archive

LibTiff Mailing List

TIFF and LibTiff Mailing List Archive
October 1999

Previous Thread
Next Thread

Previous by Thread
Next by Thread

Previous by Date
Next by Date

Contact

The TIFF Mailing List Homepage
Archive maintained by AWare Systems



New Datamatrix section



Valid HTML 4.01!



Thread

1999.10.14 09:09 "[Fwd: recommended strip size]", by Helene Danlos
1999.10.14 10:52 "Re: [Fwd: recommended strip size]", by Peter Nielsen
1999.10.14 11:36 "Re: [Fwd: recommended strip size]", by Klaus Bartz

1999.10.14 11:36 "Re: [Fwd: recommended strip size]", by Klaus Bartz

Hi Helene,
if someone has problems with your file and cannot find
any other ugly thing, he can use this recommendation to
fight with you. That is the problem, not a bigger strip.

Today you get no benefit from stripped. Most viewers will
load the whole image and then a monolithic images can 
be loaded faster.
At 1992 ( the writing date of revision 6.0 ) we would 
happy with 16 MB RAM; today we are very angry with 128 MB RAM.

If you will handle big images( >  ~ DIN A0 400 dpi 1 bpp 
or DIN A4 400 dpi 24 bpp ) tiled is better then stripped
( but most viewers do not support it in the right way).

Klaus


Helene Danlos wrote:
> 
>   ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
>    Part 1.2       Type: message/rfc822
>               Encoding: 7bit

-- 
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Dr. Klaus Bartz                                     bartzkau@ina.de
COI GmbH / Abt. KOS3    Industriestr. 1-3    D-91072 Herzogenaurach
Tel: +49 (9132) 82-3433                        Fax: +49-9132-824959