AWARE SYSTEMS
TIFF and LibTiff Mail List Archive

Thread

1999.11.30 22:23 "libtiff 3.5.3 release.", by Michael L. Welles
1999.11.30 22:53 "Re: libtiff 3.5.3 release.", by Izumi Ohzawa
1999.11.30 23:07 "Re: libtiff 3.5.3 release.", by Tom Lane
1999.12.01 00:08 "Re: libtiff 3.5.3 release.", by Michael L. Welles
1999.11.30 23:22 "Re: libtiff 3.5.3 release.", by Daniel McCoy
1999.12.01 13:56 "Re: libtiff 3.5.3 release.", by Bruce Cameron
1999.12.01 18:35 "Re: libtiff 3.5.3 release.", by Daniel McCoy
1999.12.02 07:06 "", by Ruediger
1999.12.01 03:15 "Re: libtiff 3.5.3 release.", by Bob Friesenhahn
1999.12.01 16:04 "Re: libtiff 3.5.3 release.", by Michael L. Welles
1999.12.01 16:43 "Re: libtiff 3.5.3 release.", by Tom Lane
1999.11.30 23:07 "Re: libtiff 3.5.3 release.", by Martin Bailey
1999.12.01 14:08 "Re: libtiff 3.5.3 release.", by Bruce Cameron
1999.12.01 15:02 "Re: libtiff 3.5.3 release.", by Klaus Bartz
1999.12.01 16:17 "RE: libtiff 3.5.3 release.", by Peter Smith
1999.12.01 16:49 "RE: libtiff 3.5.3 release.", by Darrin Cardani
1999.12.01 19:20 "Re: libtiff 3.5.3 release.", by Chris Hanson
1999.12.01 14:33 "Re: libtiff 3.5.3 release.", by Andy
1999.12.01 14:42 "ZIP compression [was: libtiff 3.5.3 release.]", by Tom Kacvinsky
1999.12.01 15:24 "Re: ZIP compression [was: libtiff 3.5.3 release.]", by Leonard Rosenthol
1999.12.01 15:51 "Re: ZIP compression [was: libtiff 3.5.3 release.]", by Tom Kacvinsky
1999.12.01 18:04 "Re: ZIP compression [was: libtiff 3.5.3 release.]", by Bryan H. Maret
1999.12.02 05:16 "Re: ZIP compression [was: libtiff 3.5.3 release.]", by Leonard Rosenthol
1999.12.01 17:39 "Re: ZIP compression [was: libtiff 3.5.3 release.]", by Bryan H. Maret
1999.12.02 11:42 "Re: ZIP compression [was: libtiff 3.5.3 release.]", by Ivo Penzar
1999.12.06 20:42 "Re: ZIP compression [was: libtiff 3.5.3 release.]", by Andy

1999.12.01 16:43 "Re: libtiff 3.5.3 release.", by Tom Lane

Does anyone know for a fact that an open source author has been threatened by Unisys's laywers?

I don't know of anyone having been sought out by Unisys (doesn't mean it hasn't happened, though). I do know that those who have asked Unisys about it have been offered licensing terms that are completely unworkable/inappropriate for free software. Unisys clearly does not like free software and would be just as happy if all LZW support in free software went away. I think we should oblige them...

regards, tom lane
organizer, Independent JPEG Group