AWARE SYSTEMS
TIFF and LibTiff Mail List Archive

Thread

2000.03.29 01:50 "Duplicating tiff file", by Kin Wong
2000.03.29 17:57 "Re: Duplicating tiff file", by Kin Wong
2000.03.29 07:50 "Re: Duplicating tiff file", by Tom Lane
2000.03.29 13:37 "Re: Duplicating tiff file", by Klaus Bartz
2000.03.29 18:18 "Re: Duplicating tiff file", by Rex Jolliff

2000.03.29 17:57 "Re: Duplicating tiff file", by Kin Wong

Hi,

Yes, I can recreate the header. I guess my concern is in line with Tom and Klaus's warning regarding unknown tiff tags, but in a different direction. I want the new file to be identical to the original tiff file with the exception that the pixel data has been filtered by my code. This way, I am not losing any information that may be encoded by the original application that created the file that I am processing. This way, I am preserving the originating application's tiff file format.

I will check out tiffcp.c. This sounds like it has what you all have suggested. If this doesn't work for me, then I guess I will just have to write the tiff file in my own format, however transient that may be.

Thanks for all your replies,

- Kin

Chris Friesen wrote:

> Kin Wong wrote:
>

Now, hopefully someone can help me with this question by steering me to the proper path. I want to write a general filtering program for some picture processing. So I would need to read in a tiff file, process it, and write it out to a new tiff file. The caveat is that I want to preserve the original header in the new tiff file.

>

> Do you need to preserve the exact same header, or can you simply recreate it?

>

> If it can be recreated, then all you need to do is read in all the tags at the

> beginning, then set them to the same value before writing out the new file. You > can then use encoded scanline read/write routines.

Bjorn Brox wrote:

> Take a look on tiffcp.c in the tools directory of the libtiff source.

Tom Lane and Klaus Bartz warned:

> The tiffcp tool does that, although its approach is pretty much > brute-force --- it has to know explicitly about each tag to be

> copied. OTOH, trying to copy an unknown tag is a dangerous thing > to do in TIFF; dropping unknowns is arguably the right approach.

> (PNG handles this better...)
>
> regards, tom lane
>Hi,
>copy an unknown tag is really a dangerous thing. I have had
>some trouble with it.
...
>Klaus