- 2012.01.22 17:17 "Re: [Tiff] update on tiff 4.x in debian", by Bob Friesenhahn
-
2012.01.22 19:54 "Re: [Tiff] update on tiff 4.x in debian", by Bob Friesenhahn
-
2012.01.22 20:42 "Re: [Tiff] update on tiff 4.x in debian", by Bob Friesenhahn
-
2012.01.23 01:48 "Re: [Tiff] update on tiff 4.x in debian", by Jay Berkenbilt
- 2012.01.23 05:24 "Re: [Tiff] update on tiff 4.x in debian", by Tom Lane
-
2012.01.23 15:13 "Re: [Tiff] update on tiff 4.x in debian", by Bob Friesenhahn
-
2012.01.23 15:52 "Re: [Tiff] update on tiff 4.x in debian", by Jay Berkenbilt
- 2012.01.23 16:26 "Re: [Tiff] update on tiff 4.x in debian", by Tom Lane
- 2012.01.23 17:48 "Re: [Tiff] update on tiff 4.x in debian", by Jürgen_Buchmüller
-
2012.01.23 15:52 "Re: [Tiff] update on tiff 4.x in debian", by Jay Berkenbilt
-
2012.01.23 01:48 "Re: [Tiff] update on tiff 4.x in debian", by Jay Berkenbilt
-
2012.01.22 20:42 "Re: [Tiff] update on tiff 4.x in debian", by Bob Friesenhahn
2012.01.23 14:53 "Re: [Tiff] update on tiff 4.x in debian", by Bob Friesenhahn
It's been awhile but since the last time I looked, the libtiff soname's were different by default. Have we fixed this in the default libtiff build yet?
Libtiff 4 uses a scheme intended for use by computers. Libtiff 3 uses a scheme intended for use by humans.
ie. that "libtiff.so.<N>" has a default <N> value that is the same across major Linux distributions to mean the same major version of libtiff.
With libtiff 4, the numbering/naming is likely to be consistent across Linux systems but I notice that the file naming is considerably different between Linux and FreeBSD, even though they are both ELF systems.
Bob
--
Bob Friesenhahn
bfriesen@simple.dallas.tx.us, http://www.simplesystems.org/users/bfriesen/
GraphicsMagick Maintainer, http://www.GraphicsMagick.org/