-
2000.03.30 13:33 "Re: Complex Floating Point", by Frank Warmerdam
-
2000.03.30 13:56 "Re: Complex Floating Point", by Antonio E. Scuri
-
2000.03.30 15:07 "Re: Complex Floating Point", by Chris Hanson
- 2000.03.30 16:44 "Re: Complex Floating Point", by Antonio E. Scuri
-
2000.03.30 15:07 "Re: Complex Floating Point", by Chris Hanson
-
2000.03.30 13:56 "Re: Complex Floating Point", by Antonio E. Scuri
2000.03.30 13:56 "Re: Complex Floating Point", by Antonio E. Scuri
I would like to try and discourage you from producing files with 128 bits per sample to represent complex data.
No problem. I am still deciding what to do and any suggestion will be appreciated.
Couldn't you just produce files with two samples, and 64 (or 32) bits each?
You mean 2 images in the file, one with the real part and the other with the imaginary? It is a nice solution.
I realize there wouldn't be any explicit way of recognising them as a real/imaginary pair, but perhaps that could be accomplished by other means?
I knew that a scientific image processing program called Digital Micrograph from Gatan store complex values creating a new type for SampleFormat. But this is terrible, unless there are plans for doing it that I do not know.
scuri