AWARE SYSTEMS
TIFF and LibTiff Mail List Archive

Thread

2000.03.30 10:53 "Complex Floating Point", by Antonio E. Scuri
2000.03.30 13:33 "Re: Complex Floating Point", by Frank Warmerdam
2000.03.30 13:56 "Re: Complex Floating Point", by Antonio E. Scuri
2000.03.30 15:07 "Re: Complex Floating Point", by Chris Hanson
2000.03.30 16:44 "Re: Complex Floating Point", by Antonio E. Scuri
2000.03.30 19:12 "Re: Complex Floating Point", by Cris Luengo
2000.03.31 11:34 "Re: Complex Floating Point", by Antonio E. Scuri
2000.03.31 15:14 "RE: Complex Floating Point", by Martinez, Max
2000.03.31 18:07 "RE: Complex Floating Point", by Martinez, Max
2000.03.31 17:05 "RE: Complex Floating Point", by Antonio E. Scuri
2000.03.31 18:12 "RE: Complex Floating Point", by Antonio E. Scuri
2000.03.31 18:31 "Fwd: RE: Complex Floating Point", by Antonio E. Scuri
2000.04.03 13:12 "Re: Complex Floating Point", by Frank Warmerdam
2000.03.31 18:48 "Re: Complex Floating Point", by Daniel McCoy

2000.03.31 17:05 "RE: Complex Floating Point", by Antonio E. Scuri

I agree with you. In fact my very first solution was to add a new
value. It makes many things easier. SampleFormat

   I was just wondering if we can reach another solution without changing

specs. As you can see this is much more "complex"...

>I don't see yet, however, why you would need an additional type (13, 14) >as you suggested.

   This is because you can have image attributes (Tags) that have complex

scuri