-
2008.07.03 14:58 "Re: [Tiff] eta for bigtiff support?", by Gary McGath
- 2008.07.03 15:26 "Re: [Tiff] eta for bigtiff support?", by Bob Friesenhahn
-
2008.07.03 15:28 "Re: [Tiff] eta for bigtiff support?", by Frank Warmerdam
- 2008.07.03 15:46 "Re: [Tiff] eta for bigtiff support?", by Gary McGath
-
2008.07.10 21:07 "Re: [Tiff] eta for bigtiff support?", by Joris Van Damme
- 2008.07.10 21:50 "Re: [Tiff] eta for bigtiff support?", by Gary McGath
2008.07.10 21:07 "Re: [Tiff] eta for bigtiff support?", by Joris Van Damme
Frank, all,
Frank wrote:
The specification is not in flux - however, clearly some of the documentation and web site materials have not been kept up to date and are off-putting to adoption.
Joris - can you address some of this?
On the BigTIFF page, second paragraph, I changed 'ongoing attempt to design' to 'ongoing attempt to launch'. The actual off-putting 'word of warning' paragraph about the proposal being just a first proposal, I changed completely, partially reusing Bob's recent wording of the BigTIFF status which I though was very fine and to the point.
Any suggestion for further improvement is appreciated. I'll be leaving for a very short holiday until some time next week, during which time the mailing list archive will not be updated, but I'll check it out as soon as I get back.
Best regards,
Joris Van Damme
info@awaresystems.be