AWARE [SYSTEMS]
AWare Systems, , Home TIFF and LibTiff Mailing List Archive

LibTiff Mailing List

TIFF and LibTiff Mailing List Archive
June 2008

Previous Thread
Next Thread

Previous by Thread
Next by Thread

Previous by Date
Next by Date

Contact

The TIFF Mailing List Homepage
This list is run by Frank Warmerdam
Archive maintained by AWare Systems



New Datamatrix section



Valid HTML 4.01!



2008.06.20 11:41 "Adobe are idiots [rant about new DNG 1.2 spec]", by Phil Harvey

Does anyone here use libtiff to process DNG images?  Well, you have  
some work to do:

I just learned yesterday that Adobe had released the DNG 1.2  
specification (back in April).

What was Adobe thinking!?  While the old specification is TIFF- 
compatible, these new changes are not.

Adobe has introduced a new "ExtraCameraProfiles" tag of type LONG  
that contains offsets to new Camera Profile ID's, but the new IFD's  
do not follow the standard TIFF IFD structure.  Instead, the new IFD  
contains a TIFF-like header (with a magic number of 0x4352 instead of  
0x002a), and uses offsets that are relative to the start of this header.

The effect of this change is to make the new files totally  
incompatible with any existing code.

If they really wanted to create a self-contained IFD that uses  
relative offsets (which isn't a bad idea), they should have  
implemented it differently:  Instead of storing multiple IFD's as  
LONG offsets, they should have written the entire IFD tree as  
UNDEFINED, and stored multiple IFD's using the next IFD pointer,  
similar to IFD0, IFD1, etc.  This would have allowed older software  
to rewrite the image without destroying the new information, and  
would have made things a lot easier for developers.

Honestly, I wonder sometimes what sort of idiots they hire at Adobe  
and Microsoft, because both companies have made huge blunders when  
attempting to add new tags to TIFF-format files.

Sorry about the attitude, but I just wasted all day yesterday adding  
support for these new changes, while it would have taken only a few  
minutes if Adobe had implemented it properly.

- Phil