2005.09.23 21:11 "[Tiff] Additional Lossless Compression Schemes", by Frank Warmerdam
- 2005.09.23 21:20 "Re: [Tiff] Additional Lossless Compression Schemes", by Bob Friesenhahn
- 2005.09.23 22:20 "Re: [Tiff] Additional Lossless Compression Schemes", by Chris Cox
- 2005.09.23 23:32 "RE: [Tiff] Additional Lossless Compression Schemes", by Philip Watkinson
-
2005.09.25 01:28 "Re: [Tiff] Additional Lossless Compression Schemes", by Joris Van Damme
- 2005.09.25 02:53 "Re: [Tiff] Additional Lossless Compression Schemes", by Bob Friesenhahn
-
2005.09.25 02:54 "Re: [Tiff] Additional Lossless Compression Schemes", by Frank Warmerdam
-
2005.09.25 04:16 "Re: [Tiff] Additional Lossless Compression Schemes", by Joris Van Damme
-
2005.09.25 15:14 "Re: [Tiff] Additional Lossless Compression Schemes", by Bob Friesenhahn
- 2005.09.27 02:20 "Re: [Tiff] Additional Lossless Compression Schemes", by Joris Van Damme
-
2005.09.25 15:14 "Re: [Tiff] Additional Lossless Compression Schemes", by Bob Friesenhahn
-
2005.09.25 04:16 "Re: [Tiff] Additional Lossless Compression Schemes", by Joris Van Damme
- 2005.09.25 19:27 "Re: [Tiff] Additional Lossless Compression Schemes", by
-
2005.09.27 01:05 "Re: [Tiff] Additional Lossless Compression Schemes", by Ron
-
2005.09.27 02:06 "Re: [Tiff] Additional Lossless Compression Schemes", by Joris Van Damme
- 2005.09.27 02:21 "Re: [Tiff] Additional Lossless Compression Schemes", by Bob Friesenhahn
- 2005.09.27 04:25 "Re: [Tiff] Additional Lossless Compression Schemes", by Ron
- 2005.09.27 02:25 "Re: [Tiff] Additional Lossless Compression Schemes", by Leonard Rosenthol
-
2005.09.27 02:06 "Re: [Tiff] Additional Lossless Compression Schemes", by Joris Van Damme
2005.09.25 01:01 "Re: [Tiff] Additional Lossless Compression Schemes", by Chris Cox
But it doesn't have quite the flexibility that TIFF needs.
How so?
In so much as tiled support or something else?
I second this question since JPEG is already supported by TIFF and JPEG could be viewed as less flexible than JPEG2000.
There are already vendors storing JPEG2000 in TIFF. Of course that does not mean it is a good idea.
Yeah - and at least one of them did the boneheaded move of storing an entire JP2 file inside the TIFF (with incorrect headers on the TIFF, no less).
I don't see a need to reproduce JPEG2000 in TIFF. It already does what's needed on it's own.
Borrowing some of the better ideas and making them more flexible - that I'm all for.
Chris