1999.06.03 19:48 "Large File Support", by Bruce Forsberg
-
1999.06.04 03:45 "Re: Large File Support", by Frank Warmerdam
-
1999.06.07 13:00 "Re: Large File Support", by Rainer Wiesenfarth
- 1999.06.07 13:03 "Re: Large File Support", by Frank Warmerdam
- 1999.06.08 21:14 "Re: Large File Support", by Peter Smith
-
1999.06.07 13:00 "Re: Large File Support", by Rainer Wiesenfarth
- 1999.06.04 07:32 "Re: Large File Support", by Rob Tillaart
- 1999.06.04 18:35 "RE: Large File Support", by Bruce Forsberg
- 1999.06.10 09:48 "Re: Large File Support", by Klaus Bartz
- 1999.06.10 15:10 "Re: Large File Support", by Peter Smith
- 1999.06.14 11:16 "Re: Large File Support", by Martin Bailey
1999.06.14 16:27 "Re: Large File Support", by Chris Barker
But, in the long run, a real 64-bit image file format is probably needed. Would the current compressors (LZW, JPEG, etc) scale to 64-bit images, though? That is, can you even compress a > 2GB image using the standard JPEG library?
If tiled formats are standard (entirely reasonable with files this large) the the present compressors will do fine.
--
========================================================================
Barker's law: For every inaction, there is an equal and opposite excuse.
Check out Interlinear's web page at http://www.ilt.com
========================================================================