AWARE SYSTEMS
TIFF and LibTiff Mail List Archive

Thread

2000.10.05 00:20 "Old-style JPEG and HP 9100C Digital Sender", by Tim Bell
[...]
2000.10.06 02:20 "Re: Old-style JPEG and HP 9100C Digital Sender", by Tom Lane
2000.10.06 04:14 "Re: Old-style JPEG and HP 9100C Digital Sender", by Raj Kumar S.
2000.10.06 09:36 "Re: Old-style JPEG and HP 9100C Digital Sender", by Joris Van Damme
2000.10.06 10:36 "Re: Old-style JPEG and HP 9100C Digital Sender", by Martin Bailey
2000.10.07 06:03 "Re: Old-style JPEG and HP 9100C Digital Sender", by Joris Van Damme
[...]

2000.10.06 10:36 "Re: Old-style JPEG and HP 9100C Digital Sender", by Martin Bailey

In the meantime, the argument that TTN2 has no official standing cuts no ice except with pointy- hair types.

Just to add to this, TTN2 is regarded as "official" enough to have been included as a normative reference in at least one ANSI standard and it's still there in the version that's getting close to acceptance as an ISO standard (PDF/X-1).

Regards

Martin Bailey

-------------------------------------------------------------
   Senior Technical Consultant  mailto:martinb@harlequin.com
   Digital Print & Publishing                +44 1223 873800
   Harlequin                        http://www.harlequin.com
-------------------------------------------------------------
If my views didn't usually coincide with those of my employer
  I wouldn't want to work here, but I am not a spokesman for
      Harlequin and the buck stops with me for what I say.
-------------------------------------------------------------