AWARE SYSTEMS
TIFF and LibTiff Mail List Archive

Thread

2000.10.04 16:24 "PHOTOMETRIC_YCBCR", by Raj Kumar S.
[...]
2000.10.06 14:21 "RE: Old-style JPEG and HP 9100C Digital Sender", by Martin Bailey
2000.10.06 14:44 "RE: Old-style JPEG and HP 9100C Digital Sender", by Ed Grissom
2000.10.06 15:04 "RE: Old-style JPEG and HP 9100C Digital Sender", by Martin Bailey
[...]

2000.10.06 15:04 "RE: Old-style JPEG and HP 9100C Digital Sender", by Martin Bailey

<x-flowed>At 15:21 06/10/00, Martin Bailey wrote:
 From the graphic arts side I'd like to see:

  1. improvements in the handling of photmetricinterpretation=5 when the data isn't just CMYK. The kind of spot colour handling that's provided in other formats such as CMYK (or Lab or sRGB) equivalents for each colorant, plus an indication of whether the colour should be regarded as opaque, or normal, or transparent etc. for trapping purposes.

Very odd - my last couple of paragraphs were callously deleted! Is there a message length limit on this listserve, or is it simply applying artistic judgement to my message? :-)

Just for completeness:

B)

C) Adoption of the ICC spec for embedding source profiles.

I realise that A implies that I think there is a future for TIFF as print-ready files. That's certainly true for 1-bit G4 compressed data to drive plate setters, but one step up the workflow is less obvious at the moment.

Regards

Martin Bailey

-------------------------------------------------------------
   Senior Technical Consultant  mailto:martinb@harlequin.com
   Digital Print & Publishing                +44 1223 873800
   Harlequin                        http://www.harlequin.com
-------------------------------------------------------------

If my views didn't usually coincide with those of my employer
  I wouldn't want to work here, but I am not a spokesman for
      Harlequin and the buck stops with me for what I say.
-------------------------------------------------------------

</x-flowed>