AWARE [SYSTEMS] Imaging expertise for the Delphi developer
AWare Systems, Imaging expertise for the Delphi developer, Home TIFF and LibTiff Mailing List Archive

LibTiff Mailing List

TIFF and LibTiff Mailing List Archive
April 2006

Previous Thread
Next Thread

Previous by Thread
Next by Thread

Previous by Date
Next by Date

Contact

The TIFF Mailing List Homepage
This list is run by Frank Warmerdam
Archive maintained by AWare Systems



Valid HTML 4.01!



Thread

2006.04.19 10:45 "TIFF + Group4 will last 10 years?", by Rui Castro
2006.04.19 11:40 "Re: TIFF + Group4 will last 10 years?", by Leonard Rosenthol
2006.04.19 19:26 "Re: TIFF + Group4 will last 10 years?", by Glenn Widener
2006.04.19 21:03 "Re: PDF/A vs. TIFF", by Leonard Rosenthol
2006.04.19 21:22 "Re: PDF/A vs. TIFF", by Bob Friesenhahn
2006.04.19 21:38 "Re: PDF/A vs. TIFF", by Leonard Rosenthol
2006.04.19 21:52 "Re: PDF/A vs. TIFF", by Bob Friesenhahn
2006.04.19 22:47 "Re: PDF/A vs. TIFF", by Leonard Rosenthol
2006.04.19 23:05 "Re: PDF/A vs. TIFF", by Bob Friesenhahn
2006.04.19 23:27 "Re: PDF/A vs. TIFF", by Leonard Rosenthol
2006.04.19 23:34 "Re: PDF/A vs. TIFF", by Graeme Gill
2006.04.19 23:41 "Re: PDF/A vs. TIFF", by Graeme Gill
2006.05.01 01:34 "JBIG2 patent situation", by Glenn Widener
2006.05.01 16:07 "Re: JBIG2 patent situation", by Dwight Kelly
2006.04.20 07:30 "Re: PDF/A vs. TIFF", by Brad Hards
2006.04.19 11:49 "Re: TIFF + Group4 will last 10 years?", by Rocky Pulley
2006.04.19 12:40 "Re: TIFF + Group4 will last 10 years?", by Gerben Vos
2006.04.20 20:27 "Re: TIFF + Group4 will last 10 years?", by <melser.anton@gmail.com>

2006.04.19 23:27 "Re: PDF/A vs. TIFF", by Leonard Rosenthol

At 07:05 PM 4/19/2006, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
> I happen to believe that the TIFF specification is one of the best 
> quality file format specifications available.  I have seen few that 
> are better.

I never said it wasn't...

BUT it IS incomplete when it comes to documenting the ENTIRE 
ECOSYSTEM of TIFF in use today.  And that's the crux.

It's not that TIFF COULDN'T be modified to serve the same 
purpose, by going through the same process that PDF did to become 
PDF/A....Just that it hasn't.


> It is rather difficult to know what the world of computing will be 
> like 100 years from now.

Yes it is.

And that fact the documents in the US National Archives are 
required to be maintained "until the end of the republic" and that 
documents related to the Nuclear Reg. Agency have to maintained for 
the half-life of any materials in use....100 years is NOTHING!


> Based on rapid advances in recent history, in 100 years a "computer" 
> might be an organic mass more like a human brain, it may be 
> completely optical, or based on something we are not even aware of yet.

It may well be...

But the problems of hardware and software are handled by a 
different group in ISO...The committees responsible for electronic 
file formats (PDF, TIFF/IT, etc.) don't have to worry about that aspect ;).


Leonard

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Leonard Rosenthol                            <mailto:leonardr@pdfsages.com>
Chief Technical Officer                      <http://www.pdfsages.com>
PDF Sages, Inc.                              215-938-7080 (voice)
                                              215-938-0880 (fax)