AWARE [SYSTEMS] Imaging expertise for the Delphi developer
AWare Systems, Imaging expertise for the Delphi developer, Home TIFF and LibTiff Mailing List Archive

LibTiff Mailing List

TIFF and LibTiff Mailing List Archive
July 2007

Previous Thread
Next Thread

Previous by Thread
Next by Thread

Previous by Date
Next by Date

Contact

The TIFF Mailing List Homepage
This list is run by Frank Warmerdam
Archive maintained by AWare Systems



Valid HTML 4.01!



Thread

2007.07.01 17:12 "Re: BigTIFF extension issue", by Bob Friesenhahn
2007.07.02 09:08 "Re: BigTIFF extension issue", by Andy Cave
2007.07.02 14:22 "Re: BigTIFF extension issue", by Frank Warmerdam
2007.07.03 10:54 "Re: BigTIFF extension issue", by Joris Van Damme

2007.07.02 14:22 "Re: BigTIFF extension issue", by Frank Warmerdam

Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
> Way back in 2004 there was a long discussion of what extension to use 
> for BigTIFF (see http://www.asmail.be/msg0055326857.html). Re-reading 
> this discussion, I see a lot of good points, but don't see any obvious 
> conclusion.  It seems like a case of allowing the market/users to decide.
> 
> I have started to update my application to support BigTIFF.  I am happy 
> to support the extension ".tiff" but of course there are other 
> proposals.  Initially, it does not seem like anyone will be casually 
> writing BigTIFF files since Classic TIFF (TM) provides assured coverage 
> to at least 2GB file sizes (and often 4GB) and users of large files know 
> who they are and will explicitly decide to use BigTIFF. This means that 
> it will take time before BigTIFF files are encountered in "the wild".
> 
> Given the state of the computing universe, does anyone care about three 
> character file extensions any more?  Are there systems still in use 
> (reasonably expected to encounter a BigTIFF file) which make their 
> format decisions based on a three character extension, or is this 
> behavior now effectively extinct?

Bob,

I am supportive of using the same extension for BigTIFF as for tiff, for
the many reasons stated by others.  I also discourage applications putting
much emphasis on extensions and I see TIFFs produced with a variety of
extensions.  I'm not sure how much more can be constructively accomplished
on this topic.

Best regards,
-- 
---------------------------------------+--------------------------------------
I set the clouds in motion - turn up   | Frank Warmerdam, warmerdam@pobox.com
light and sound - activate the windows | http://pobox.com/~warmerdam
and watch the world go round - Rush    | President OSGeo, http://osgeo.org