AWARE [SYSTEMS] Imaging expertise for the Delphi developer
AWare Systems, Imaging expertise for the Delphi developer, Home TIFF and LibTiff Mailing List Archive

LibTiff Mailing List

TIFF and LibTiff Mailing List Archive
October 2005

Previous Thread
Next Thread

Previous by Thread
Next by Thread

Previous by Date
Next by Date

Contact

The TIFF Mailing List Homepage
This list is run by Frank Warmerdam
Archive maintained by AWare Systems



Valid HTML 4.01!



Thread

2005.10.27 06:40 "How located pixels with BitsPerSample not bound to byte?", by Eugene Shebeko
2005.10.27 13:57 "Re: How located pixels with BitsPerSample not bound to byte?", by Frank Warmerdam
2005.10.28 03:18 "Re: How located pixels with BitsPerSample not bound to byte?", by David Mckenzie
2005.10.28 03:42 "Re: How located pixels with BitsPerSample not bound to byte?", by Frank Warmerdam
2005.10.28 04:08 "Re: How located pixels with BitsPerSample not bound to byte?", by Bob Friesenhahn
2005.10.28 04:21 "Re: How located pixels with BitsPerSample not bound to byte?", by Chris Cox
2005.11.07 19:18 "Re: How located pixels with BitsPerSample not bound to byte?", by Joris Van Damme
2005.11.07 20:26 "Re: How located pixels with BitsPerSample not bound to byte?", by Bob Friesenhahn
2005.11.09 05:00 "Re: How located pixels with BitsPerSample not bound to byte?", by Chris Cox
2005.11.13 18:05 "Re: How located pixels with BitsPerSample not bound to byte?", by Andrey Kiselev
2005.10.27 15:55 "Re: How located pixels with BitsPerSample not bound to byte?", by Bob Friesenhahn

2005.11.07 20:26 "Re: How located pixels with BitsPerSample not bound to byte?", by Bob Friesenhahn

On Mon, 7 Nov 2005, Joris wrote:
>
> You misunderstood my feelings about byteswapping 24bit data...
>
> All by itself, I do think the convention to byteswap this is
> unfortunate, you got that right.
>
> However, I feel it is much more important that we have a person or
> organisation with authority, that jumps in when needed, and provides
> standardized conventions for us. I mean, there is no 'right' or 'wrong'
> (even if there is 'fortunate' and 'maybe less fortunate'), there is only
> 'convention', as in 'specification', or, much worse, the lack of it.

I agree that we should feel very fortunate that Chris Cox works for 
Adobe and takes care to describe Adobe TIFF extensions in the form of 
a specification.  There is almost always someone available to disagree 
with any opinion or statement.

Speaking of specifications, a while back Chris posted a draft 
specification for 16/24 bit floats in TIFF (as supported by Photoshop 
CS2) but I have not noticed that a final version of that document has 
been posted yet.

Bob
======================================
Bob Friesenhahn
bfriesen@simple.dallas.tx.us, http://www.simplesystems.org/users/bfriesen/
GraphicsMagick Maintainer,    http://www.GraphicsMagick.org/