LibTiff Mailing List

On Tue, 4 Jan 2011, Lee Howard wrote:
>
> I can certainly understand that at this point where we have a
> development branch and a maintenance branch that any new feature
> enhancements should go only into the development branch.  But in my mind
> bug-fixes go in both branches at least until the development branch cuts
> a versioned release.

I agree with the above.  In fact, even once 4.0 is formally released, 
we should still be willing to apply security fixes to 3.9.X on the 
branch.

Bob
-- 
Bob Friesenhahn
bfriesen@simple.dallas.tx.us, http://www.simplesystems.org/users/bfriesen/
GraphicsMagick Maintainer,    http://www.GraphicsMagick.org/


AWARE [SYSTEMS]		Imaging expertise for the Delphi developer
		TIFF and LibTiff Mailing List Archive
	LibTiff Mailing List TIFF and LibTiff Mailing List Archive January 2011 Previous Thread Next Thread Previous by Thread Next by Thread Previous by Date Next by Date Contact The TIFF Mailing List Homepage This list is run by Frank Warmerdam Archive maintained by AWare Systems	Thread 2011.01.01 13:41 "Regression in libtiff 4.0 CVS when creating a JPEG RGB contig", by Even Rouault 2011.01.01 13:53 "Re: Regression in libtiff 4.0 CVS when creating a JPEG RGB contig", by Even Rouault 2011.01.04 02:52 "Re: Regression in libtiff 4.0 CVS when creating a JPEG RGB contig", by Lee Howard 2011.01.04 19:20 "Re: Regression in libtiff 4.0 CVS when creating a JPEG RGB contig", by Even Rouault 2011.01.04 19:47 "Re: Regression in libtiff 4.0 CVS when creating a JPEG RGB contig", by Lee Howard 2011.01.04 20:50 "Re: Regression in libtiff 4.0 CVS when creating a JPEG RGB contig", by Even Rouault 2011.01.04 21:39 "[SPAM WARNING]Re: [Tiff] Regression in libtiff 4.0 CVS when creating a JPEG RGB contig", by <peter.bauer@datamine.ca> 2011.01.04 22:10 "Re: libtiff 4.0 stable? [was: Regression in libtiff 4.0 CVS when creating a JPEG RGB contig]", by Edward Lam 2011.01.05 00:03 "Re: libtiff 4.0 stable? [was: Regression in libtiff 4.0 CVS when creating a JPEG RGB contig]", by Frank Warmerdam 2011.01.05 02:19 "Re: libtiff 4.0 stable? [was: Regression in libtiff 4.0 CVS when creating a JPEG RGB contig]", by Bob Friesenhahn 2011.01.07 14:58 "Re: libtiff 4.0 stable? [was: Regression in libtiff 4.0 CVS when creating a JPEG RGB contig]", by Edward Lam 2011.01.07 17:42 "Re: libtiff 4.0 stable? [was: Regression in libtiff 4.0 CVS when creating a JPEG RGB contig]", by Bob Friesenhahn 2011.01.10 17:52 "Re: libtiff 4.0 stable? [was: Regression in libtiff 4.0 CVS when creating a JPEG RGB contig]", by Joris Van Damme 2011.01.05 02:06 "Re: Regression in libtiff 4.0 CVS when creating a JPEG RGB contig", by Bob Friesenhahn 2011.01.04 19:28 "Re: Regression in libtiff 4.0 CVS when creating a JPEG RGB contig", by Dwight Kelly 2011.01.04 19:32 "Re: Regression in libtiff 4.0 CVS when creating a JPEG RGB contig", by Even Rouault 2011.01.04 02:44 "Re: Regression in libtiff 4.0 CVS when creating a JPEG RGB contig", by Lee Howard 2011.01.05 02:06 "Re: Regression in libtiff 4.0 CVS when creating a JPEG RGB contig", by Bob Friesenhahn On Tue, 4 Jan 2011, Lee Howard wrote: > > I can certainly understand that at this point where we have a > development branch and a maintenance branch that any new feature > enhancements should go only into the development branch. But in my mind > bug-fixes go in both branches at least until the development branch cuts > a versioned release. I agree with the above. In fact, even once 4.0 is formally released, we should still be willing to apply security fixes to 3.9.X on the branch. Bob -- Bob Friesenhahn bfriesen@simple.dallas.tx.us, http://www.simplesystems.org/users/bfriesen/ GraphicsMagick Maintainer, http://www.GraphicsMagick.org/

LibTiff Mailing List

Thread

2011.01.05 02:06 "Re: Regression in libtiff 4.0 CVS when creating a JPEG RGB contig", by Bob Friesenhahn