AWARE [SYSTEMS] Imaging expertise for the Delphi developer
AWare Systems, Imaging expertise for the Delphi developer, Home TIFF and LibTiff Mailing List Archive

LibTiff Mailing List

TIFF and LibTiff Mailing List Archive
May 1997

Previous Thread
Next Thread

Previous by Thread
Next by Thread

Previous by Date
Next by Date


The TIFF Mailing List Homepage
This list is run by Frank Warmerdam
Archive maintained by AWare Systems

Valid HTML 4.01!


1997.05.08 13:50 "CCITT Group 4 compression and 256 Colors", by Sanjay G Prabhudesai
1997.05.08 21:05 "Re: CCITT Group 4 compression and 256 Colors", by Gregory W Cook
1997.05.08 21:06 "Re: CCITT Group 4 compression and 256 Colors", by Daniel Mccoy

1997.05.08 21:05 "Re: CCITT Group 4 compression and 256 Colors", by Gregory W Cook

> Hello,
> It's me again. I am stuck with a problem. In my previous mails, I had
> enquired about this problem and I had got quite a few responses. 
> However, I am facing a problem right now and I am in need of the solution
> urgently.
> The problem is that when libtiff is used, and the image being created uses
> Group 4 compression, then it does not convert to TIFF file. It gives a
> message 
> "For Group 3/4 compression, bits per sample must be 1".
> However, bits/samples is 4/8 for color images as provided by the TIFF 6.0
> specs. Also, specs says that the Group 4 compression can be used only for
> bilevel, and not for the color images. In this situation, can I compress
> the image using Group 4 compression ? 

I've seen at least 4 TIFF mailing list replies to this question, all correct.
Perhaps there is a language barrier here, but the answer is still,
and always has been:


Aside from the fact that virtually no other TIFF reader would successfully
decompress it, the compression you get is horribly inefficient.

> Also, is there any way out on this perticular situation?

One more time:

Use either LZW or Deflate (zlib) compression.  The best results use a 
differencing filter before the compression. 

> Also, one of the responses received by me last time suggested that this is
> possible, but the compressed image size is very large compared to the
> original image size. But I feel that is NOT the better alternative. 
> Please extend your help in this situation.
> regards,
> Sanjay Prabhudesai

What is unclear here is why the images are compressed using Group 4 to
begin with.  The best solution would be to stop using Group 4 compression,
since it won't be very efficient anyway.  If for some reason you can't do
that, you may have to modify libtiff source code for your particular 
images.  Whatever you do, *don't* use a color image/G4 combination and
call it TIFF.

Greg Cook,
Video and Image Processing Laboratory (VIPER)
Purdue University
West Lafayette, Indiana, USA