AWARE SYSTEMS
TIFF and LibTiff Mail List Archive

Thread

2004.02.09 17:02 "[Tiff] Photoshop 8.0 and libtiff", by Don Ellis
2004.02.09 17:46 "Re: [Tiff] Photoshop 8.0 and libtiff", by Bob Friesenhahn
2004.02.09 18:07 "Re: [Tiff] Photoshop 8.0 and libtiff", by Frank Warmerdam
2004.02.09 19:42 "RE: [Tiff] Photoshop 8.0 and libtiff", by Don Ellis
2004.02.09 19:51 "RE: [Tiff] Photoshop 8.0 and libtiff", by Bob Friesenhahn
2004.02.13 19:11 "RE: [Tiff] Photoshop 8.0 and libtiff", by Don Ellis
2004.02.09 19:58 "Re: [Tiff] Photoshop 8.0 and libtiff", by Frank Warmerdam
2004.02.09 19:59 "RE: [Tiff] Photoshop 8.0 and libtiff", by Thomas J. Kacvinsky
2004.02.09 20:18 "RE: [Tiff] Photoshop 8.0 and libtiff", by Chris Cox
2004.02.09 19:48 "Re: [Tiff] Photoshop 8.0 and libtiff", by Bob Friesenhahn
2004.02.09 19:59 "Re: [Tiff] Photoshop 8.0 and libtiff", by Frank Warmerdam
2004.02.09 20:12 "Re: [Tiff] Photoshop 8.0 and libtiff", by Bob Friesenhahn
2004.02.09 20:36 "RE: [Tiff] Photoshop 8.0 and libtiff", by Don Ellis
2004.02.09 20:25 "RE: [Tiff] Photoshop 8.0 and libtiff", by Don Ellis
2004.02.09 20:50 "RE: [Tiff] Photoshop 8.0 and libtiff", by Bob Friesenhahn
2004.02.11 18:39 "RE: [Tiff] Photoshop 8.0 and libtiff", by Don Ellis

2004.02.09 17:46 "Re: [Tiff] Photoshop 8.0 and libtiff", by Bob Friesenhahn

Is it possible to use 'unsigned int' or 'unsigned long' instead? The 32-bit CPU is not going to be able to address more range than an 'unsigned int' will support. All that a 64-bit signed type buys you is support for negative values. Does use of an unsigned type cause problems for the interface?

Bob

======================================
Bob Friesenhahn
bfriesen@simple.dallas.tx.us
http://www.simplesystems.org/users/bfriesen