AWARE [SYSTEMS] Imaging expertise for the Delphi developer
AWare Systems, Imaging expertise for the Delphi developer, Home TIFF and LibTiff Mailing List Archive

LibTiff Mailing List

TIFF and LibTiff Mailing List Archive
May 2004

Previous Thread
Next Thread

Previous by Thread
Next by Thread

Previous by Date
Next by Date

Contact

The TIFF Mailing List Homepage
This list is run by Frank Warmerdam
Archive maintained by AWare Systems



Valid HTML 4.01!



Thread

2004.05.27 01:15 "large TIFF - two alternatives", by Steve Carlsen
2004.05.27 07:30 "Re: large TIFF - two alternatives", by Andrey Kiselev
2004.05.27 15:02 "Re: large TIFF - two alternatives", by Steve Carlsen
2004.05.27 09:25 "Re: large TIFF - two alternatives", by Rob Tillaart
2004.05.27 14:00 "Re: large TIFF - two alternatives", by Steve Carlsen
2004.05.27 10:43 "Re: large TIFF - two alternatives", by John Aldridge
2004.05.27 12:49 "Re: large TIFF - two alternatives", by Andrey Kiselev
2004.05.27 13:05 "Re: large TIFF - two alternatives", by Frank Warmerdam
2004.05.27 18:31 "Re: large TIFF - two alternatives", by Chris Cox
2004.06.01 11:50 "Re: large TIFF - two alternatives", by John Aldridge
2004.06.01 15:46 "Re: large TIFF - two alternatives", by Steve Carlsen
2004.06.01 16:27 "Re: large TIFF - two alternatives", by Ed Grissom
2004.06.02 14:20 "Re: large TIFF - two alternatives", by Steve Carlsen
2004.06.03 06:40 "Re: large TIFF - two alternatives", by Rob Tillaart
2004.05.27 16:37 "Re: large TIFF - two alternatives", by Frank Warmerdam
2004.05.27 18:41 "Re: large TIFF - two alternatives", by Chris Cox
2004.05.27 19:15 "Re: large TIFF - two alternatives", by Frank Warmerdam
2004.06.04 13:31 "Re: large TIFF - two alternatives", by Ed Grissom
2004.06.04 14:01 "Re: large TIFF - two alternatives", by Frank Warmerdam
2004.06.04 15:03 "Re: large TIFF - two alternatives", by Ed Grissom
2004.06.09 20:33 "Re: large TIFF - two alternatives", by Steve Carlsen
2004.06.10 07:37 "Re: large TIFF - two alternatives", by Rob Tillaart
2004.06.10 20:41 "Re: large TIFF - two alternatives", by Chris Cox
2004.06.10 21:11 "Re: large TIFF - two alternatives", by Phillip Crews

2004.05.27 18:41 "Re: large TIFF - two alternatives", by Chris Cox

>
> So, back to option 1, what would it take to get this ball rolling?  Would
> Adobe consider producing an updated specification that addresses this?

Yes, but that will take a while (our managers tend to put feature 
development ahead of standards updates ;-).
I'm already planning to update the spec. for a new predictor and 
general cleanup (integrate the tech notes, kill the obsolete JPEG 
section, etc.).


> Would
> it be helpful for the libtiff team to go ahead with prototype 
> implementation of
> the new format for "test driving"?

Yes (in a branch, of course!).


> I am personally very in favor of specification
> documents developed concurrently with a couple of interoperable 
> implementations of
> the specification.

The best idea would probably be setting up a TWIKI site to keep an 
ongoing list of differences from the TIFF 6 spec, and include any 
implementation issues we come across.  I'm not sure if we'd want it 
fully public or private.


> Steve's Alternative 1 pretty much
> captures what I wanted to accomplish albeit at the cost that older readers
> can't possible get anything from the new files till updated.

That's why it really needs a different file extension.

Chris