AWARE [SYSTEMS] Imaging expertise for the Delphi developer
AWare Systems, Imaging expertise for the Delphi developer, Home TIFF and LibTiff Mailing List Archive

LibTiff Mailing List

TIFF and LibTiff Mailing List Archive
April 2006

Previous Thread
Next Thread

Previous by Thread
Next by Thread

Previous by Date
Next by Date

Contact

The TIFF Mailing List Homepage
This list is run by Frank Warmerdam
Archive maintained by AWare Systems



Valid HTML 4.01!



Thread

2006.04.04 16:50 "BigTIFF Suggestion", by Larry Michaels
2006.04.04 21:33 "Re: BigTIFF Suggestion", by Chris Cox
2006.04.04 21:56 "Re: BigTIFF Suggestion", by Joris Van Damme
2006.04.05 01:59 "Re: BigTIFF Suggestion", by Bob Friesenhahn
2006.04.05 02:22 "Re: BigTIFF Suggestion", by Joris Van Damme
2006.04.06 09:46 "Re: BigTIFF Suggestion", by Gerben Vos
2006.04.06 15:11 "Re: BigTIFF Suggestion", by Bob Friesenhahn
2006.04.14 17:44 "Re: BigTIFF Suggestion", by <melser.anton@gmail.com>
2006.04.14 18:13 "Re: BigTIFF Suggestion", by Joris Van Damme
2006.04.15 10:18 "Re: BigTIFF Suggestion", by <melser.anton@gmail.com>
2006.04.04 22:09 "Re: BigTIFF Suggestion", by Frank Warmerdam
2006.04.04 22:14 "Re: BigTIFF Suggestion", by Larry Michaels
2006.04.04 22:24 "Re: BigTIFF Suggestion", by Joris Van Damme
2006.04.04 22:34 "Re: BigTIFF Suggestion", by Larry Michaels
2006.04.04 22:42 "Re: BigTIFF Suggestion", by Joris Van Damme
2006.04.04 23:07 "Re: BigTIFF Suggestion", by Larry Michaels
2006.04.05 00:17 "Re: BigTIFF Suggestion", by Joris Van Damme
2006.04.05 02:25 "Re: BigTIFF Suggestion", by Joris Van Damme
2006.04.05 11:12 "Re: BigTIFF Suggestion", by Leonard Rosenthol
2006.04.05 16:13 "Re: BigTIFF Suggestion", by Bill Bither

2006.04.14 18:13 "Re: BigTIFF Suggestion", by Joris Van Damme

Antoine,

Antoine wrote:
> This is probably a stupid comment...
> I thought you could create your own tags with tiff? I would be shocked
> to find that that wasn't the case with bigTiff (having strictly 0
> knowledge of the aforementioned...)... so why not create your own tag
> and be done with it?

Because a tag's logical scope is the IFD, not the file.

Suppose that wouldn't be the case. Then each IFD unlink, or IFD append,
or IFD copy operation or whatever, had to scan through every IFD in the
file to find tags that it should change to reflect that operation. Even
more importantly, knowledge of all tags would be required for these
operations, and thus the whole scheme of private tags would be
invalidated.

> ps. the tag may not be "standard", but that doesn't stop anyone from
> optimising their app... after all - what about wang annotations?

Wang annotations like any properly designed private tag that doesn't
break TIFF, is a registered private tag with strict IFD scope.


Best regards,

Joris Van Damme
info@awaresystems.be
http://www.awaresystems.be/
Download your free TIFF tag viewer for windows here:
http://www.awaresystems.be/imaging/tiff/astifftagviewer.html