AWARE [SYSTEMS] Imaging expertise for the Delphi developer
AWare Systems, Imaging expertise for the Delphi developer, Home TIFF and LibTiff Mailing List Archive

LibTiff Mailing List

TIFF and LibTiff Mailing List Archive
March 2000

Previous Thread
Next Thread

Previous by Thread
Next by Thread

Previous by Date
Next by Date

Contact

The TIFF Mailing List Homepage
This list is run by Frank Warmerdam
Archive maintained by AWare Systems



Valid HTML 4.01!



Thread

2000.03.30 10:53 "Complex Floating Point", by Antonio E Scuri
2000.03.30 13:33 "Re: Complex Floating Point", by Frank Warmerdam
2000.03.30 13:56 "Re: Complex Floating Point", by Antonio E Scuri
2000.03.30 15:07 "Re: Complex Floating Point", by Chris Hanson
2000.03.30 16:44 "Re: Complex Floating Point", by Antonio E Scuri
2000.03.30 19:12 "Re: Complex Floating Point", by Cris Luengo
2000.03.31 11:34 "Re: Complex Floating Point", by Antonio E Scuri
2000.03.31 15:14 "Re: Complex Floating Point", by Max Martinez
2000.03.31 17:05 "Re: Complex Floating Point", by Antonio E Scuri
2000.03.31 18:07 "Re: Complex Floating Point", by Max Martinez
2000.03.31 18:12 "Re: Complex Floating Point", by Antonio E Scuri
2000.03.31 18:31 "Fwd: RE: Complex Floating Point", by Antonio E Scuri
2000.04.03 13:12 "Re: Complex Floating Point", by Frank Warmerdam
2000.03.31 18:48 "Re: Complex Floating Point", by Daniel Mccoy
2000.03.31 11:36 "Complex Floating Point", by Antonio E Scuri

2000.03.30 19:12 "Re: Complex Floating Point", by Cris Luengo

"Antonio E. Scuri" wrote:
>
> > I think what he means is rather than one image with one 128-bit complex
> > sample per pixel, produce a single image with two 64-bit
> > double-precision samples per pixel, treating one of these samples as the
> > real part and one as the imaginary part.  This should be possible to do
> > in the TIFF format right now, without any sort of extensions.
> 
> Sorry, I forgot that. But I did because I also consider the case of
> images with more that 1 SamplesPerPixel, like RGB images.
>
> If I save a complex RGB image using 6 SamplesPerPixel, I guess that the
> 3 first samples must be the real part, and the 3 last the imaginary. So if
> some one that understands floating point images, but do not for complex,
> can at least read the real part. Ok?

How about storing two images in the same TIFF file? One is the RGB real part,
the other RGB imaginary.

Also I would recommend some other file format for storing stuff no-one is going
to be able to read anyway. You are only fooling people by making a file that
looks readable, but turns out not to be. (this is just an opinion)

Cris.