AWARE [SYSTEMS] Imaging expertise for the Delphi developer
AWare Systems, Imaging expertise for the Delphi developer, Home TIFF and LibTiff Mailing List Archive

LibTiff Mailing List

TIFF and LibTiff Mailing List Archive
July 1998

Previous Thread
Next Thread

Previous by Thread
Next by Thread

Previous by Date
Next by Date

Contact

The TIFF Mailing List Homepage
This list is run by Frank Warmerdam
Archive maintained by AWare Systems



Valid HTML 4.01!



Thread

1998.07.29 19:13 "16 bit grayscale", by Mark Koch
1998.07.29 20:49 "Re: 16 bit grayscale", by Tom Lane
1998.07.29 22:22 "Re: 16 bit grayscale", by Doug Morris
1998.07.29 23:21 "Re: 16 bit grayscale", by Sam Leffler
1998.07.30 16:25 "Re: 16 bit grayscale", by Daniel Mccoy
1998.07.30 18:35 "Re: 16 bit grayscale", by Ed Grissom

1998.07.30 18:35 "Re: 16 bit grayscale", by Ed Grissom

In a previous message, Dan said -

> The library already does it. It has for years now.
> 
Yes, exactly right !  we have our own (non-LibTIFF) Raster I/O library, and
have been using LibTIFF to verify the correctness of our implementation.
Recently I upgraded our code to do 16-bit stuff and was pleasantly surprised
to find that LibTIFF could handle 16-bit.

However, I found some problems when using anything but uncompressed - full
16-bit data.  12-bit data is common in satellite and medical imaging, and
there are problems in either the library or some of the distributed tools
when handling such data - especially with compressed storage (mainly dealing
with "packing" of unused bits as described in the TIFF spec).

> I sure wish Adobe would either update the dang spec or give it 
> to someone who will.   
> 
AGREED !!!   I have a list of features that we desperately need in TIFF, but
some of them are fairly major changes that we don't want to go off on our
own and do.  We would much rather have an agreed upon standard to follow.
These include: 

* ability to store large images (greater than 4 GB), 
* photometric interpretation of multi-band images (7-band landsat for
instance)
* sparse images ( tiles with "NO DATA" in them)
* ability to specify a transparent pixel value (not a mask)


> Why don't you just give the TIFF spec to a capable committee
> of people 
> 
I may not have been very vocal on this list recently, but I participated in
both the 6.0 TAC and the TTN2 discussions and would relish the opportunity
to be on such a committee.  Please feel free to include my name if such a
chance arises.

--
ed grissom
egrissom@ingr.com