AWARE [SYSTEMS] Imaging expertise for the Delphi developer
AWare Systems, Imaging expertise for the Delphi developer, Home TIFF and LibTiff Mailing List Archive

LibTiff Mailing List

TIFF and LibTiff Mailing List Archive
October 2005

Previous Thread
Next Thread

Previous by Thread
Next by Thread

Previous by Date
Next by Date

Contact

The TIFF Mailing List Homepage
This list is run by Frank Warmerdam
Archive maintained by AWare Systems



Valid HTML 4.01!



Thread

2005.10.18 11:31 "Small bug report, tif_fax3.c and tif_row", by Joris Van Damme
2005.10.18 13:14 "Re: Small bug report, tif_fax3.c and tif_row", by Joris Van Damme
2005.10.18 13:58 "Re: Small bug report, tif_fax3.c and tif_row", by Frank Warmerdam

2005.10.18 11:31 "Small bug report, tif_fax3.c and tif_row", by Joris Van Damme

Folks,

In tif_fax3.c, Fax4Decode decodes a strip (or tile) of data. Inside this
process, tif->tif_row is often used as a parameter inside warning and
error reports (style '... at scanline xxx'). However, this tif->tif_row
is not incremented inside this process. The results is that I'm seeing a
huge number of warnings about the same scanline 0, while in reality they
all apply to different scanlines.

Can anyone shed some light on this? Where, in the LibTiff design, is
tif->tif_row actually meant to be incremented? How is this supposed to
work inside strip/tile decoders?



Joris Van Damme
info@awaresystems.be
http://www.awaresystems.be/
Download your free TIFF tag viewer for windows here:
http://www.awaresystems.be/imaging/tiff/astifftagviewer.html