2004.07.08 10:03 "[Tiff] Is GDAL "errno-safe" ?", by Julien Demaria

2004.07.08 10:03 "[Tiff] Is GDAL "errno-safe" ?", by Julien Demaria


I maintain an application which used libTIFF and I'm "upgrading" to GDAL. I want to use GDAL directly for all drivers except for TIFF files to keep our existent optimized code for TIFF files (the major argument is that with GDAL we must always read RGB contigu TIFF in 3 separate bands and this is slower than using directly the contigu data, above all you want finally rewrite the data in a contigu TIFF, isn't it ?) So for TIFF files I try to use tiff functions embedded in GDAL shared library ; and it seams to work very well.

All works well except when I try to open a TIFF file in write mode, because my application handle a errno 9 ("Bad file descriptor") after the XTIFFOpen call:

I call XTIFFOpen in write mode =>... TIFFClientOpen and in TIFFClientOpen fuction at line 278 in tif_open.c, I understand that we test if we can read the file (even for write mode) with ReadOK function which finally calls fread in cpl_vsisimple.cpp This fread call set errno to 9 ("Bad file descriptor"), but this is a "normal" case handled by TIFFClientOpen.

The problem is that errno is set to 9, but there isn't any "real error".

Maybe it is possible to modify TIFFClientOpen to be "errno-safe"?

I've also noted in the past a similar problem also in TIFFClientOpen at line 365 when try to use memory-mapped file: if the test of mmap fails, errno is set to ENOMEM.

I think also GDALOpen isn't "errno-safe" when it try to open the file with each driver ; I've a least one example which set errno to 2 I believe... If you want I can search the driver in cause...

Best Regards,