2024.02.03 15:00 "[Tiff] www.libtiff.org is restored", by Bob Friesenhahn
-
2024.02.03 15:20 "Re: [Tiff] www.libtiff.org is restored", by Even Rouault
-
2024.02.03 16:15 "Re: [Tiff] www.libtiff.org is restored", by Bob Friesenhahn
- 2024.02.03 16:31 "Re: [Tiff] www.libtiff.org is restored", by Miguel Medalha
-
2024.02.03 23:21 "Re: [Tiff] www.libtiff.org is restored", by Patrice Fournier
- 2024.02.03 23:36 "Re: [Tiff] www.libtiff.org is restored", by Paul Hemmer
- 2024.02.04 13:59 "Re: [Tiff] www.libtiff.org is restored", by Bob Friesenhahn
- 2024.02.04 14:48 "Re: [Tiff] www.libtiff.org is restored", by Bob Friesenhahn
-
2024.02.03 16:15 "Re: [Tiff] www.libtiff.org is restored", by Bob Friesenhahn
- 2024.02.07 03:15 "Re: [Tiff] www.libtiff.org is restored", by Edward Lam
- 2024.03.15 18:34 "Re: [Tiff] libtiff | tiffcrop produces wrong output when 'raw' and 'rgb' parameters are used with jpeg compression (parameters have reverse effect) (#228)", by Miguel Medalha
- 2024.04.09 15:49 "[Tiff] www.libtiff.org is restored", by Michael Vetter
2024.02.04 06:28 "Re: [Tiff] www.libtiff.org is restored", by Vincent Torri
There should be no reason for tiff2ps in 2024….but I agree that having a high quality, open source, TIFF->PDF solution benefits everyone.
Given the advances in PDF since the last time that tool was touched, it would probably be more reasonable to see if we could partner up with some other solution to keep that supported into the future. Alternatively, maybe this is an opportunity to improve the PDF output in something like GraphicsMagick - Bob??
do you plan to use an external lib for pdf output, like poppler or mupdf?
Vincent Torri