AWARE [SYSTEMS] Imaging expertise for the Delphi developer
AWare Systems, Imaging expertise for the Delphi developer, Home TIFF and LibTiff Mailing List Archive

LibTiff Mailing List

TIFF and LibTiff Mailing List Archive
April 2005

Previous Thread
Next Thread

Previous by Thread
Next by Thread

Previous by Date
Next by Date

Contact

The TIFF Mailing List Homepage
This list is run by Frank Warmerdam
Archive maintained by AWare Systems



Valid HTML 4.01!



Thread

2005.04.11 00:03 "TIFF Technote 3, draft 1", by Chris Cox
2005.04.11 08:34 "Re: TIFF Technote 3, draft 1", by Joris Van Damme
2005.04.11 21:04 "Re: TIFF Technote 3, draft 1", by Chris Cox
2005.04.11 23:20 "Re: TIFF Technote 3, draft 1", by Joris Van Damme
2005.04.12 02:29 "Re: TIFF Technote 3, draft 1", by Chris Cox
2005.04.12 03:48 "Re: TIFF Technote 3, draft 1", by Joris Van Damme
2005.04.12 03:55 "Re: TIFF Technote 3, draft 1", by Chris Cox
2005.04.12 04:08 "Re: TIFF Technote 3, draft 1", by Joris Van Damme

2005.04.11 23:20 "Re: TIFF Technote 3, draft 1", by Joris Van Damme

Chris,

Thanks for your clarification.

> Without the predictor, you do have to byte swap the image data for
> floating point data that has BitsPerSample equal to a multiple of 8.
> Yeah, that should be obvious.

I appologise for my stupidity. I am totally unaware of the Motorola platform,
for all I knew IEEE floats could have been orderer exactly the same there as on
the Intel platform, as opposed to integer 16bit values, and contemplating that
possibility confused the issue for me.

> With this predictor, you don't need to do that extra step, because
> the predictor does byte reordering as part of the prediction process.
> (which complicates the TIFF pipeline a little, but does help
> compression quite a bit).

I've had an extra look at the sample code, and together with your clarification,
I *think* I understand now, but I'm still not entirely sure. Am I seeing
correctly now that, with the predictor in use, the image data is equal in both
byteorder flavor TIFFs? Are there any test images available in both byte orders,
preferably both combined with and without predictor scheme, that would allow me
to test my understanding?

Abusing the fact that I have your attention, I'd like to ask something that is
only remotely related, in that it also shares my confusion surrounding byte
order in image data... Say you have 3 channels, 12, 13, and 16 bits wide, in
ordinary TIFF, with ordinary integer SampleFormat. That means the 16bits channel
does not even start on a byte boundary for most columns. Is it nevertheless
subject to byteswapping?

Thanks again for your clarification, and kind patience.


Joris Van Damme
info@awaresystems.be
http://www.awaresystems.be/
Download your free TIFF tag viewer for windows here:
http://www.awaresystems.be/imaging/tiff/astifftagviewer.html