AWARE [SYSTEMS] Imaging expertise for the Delphi developer
AWare Systems, Imaging expertise for the Delphi developer, Home TIFF and LibTiff Mailing List Archive

LibTiff Mailing List

TIFF and LibTiff Mailing List Archive
October 2006

Previous Thread
Next Thread

Previous by Thread
Next by Thread

Previous by Date
Next by Date

Contact

The TIFF Mailing List Homepage
This list is run by Frank Warmerdam
Archive maintained by AWare Systems



Valid HTML 4.01!



Thread

2006.10.16 20:34 "Tag 346", by Ross Presser
2006.10.16 21:24 "Re: Tag 346", by Joris Van Damme
2006.10.16 21:47 "Re: Tag 346", by Ross Presser
2006.10.16 21:57 "Re: Tag 346", by Bob Friesenhahn
2006.10.16 22:50 "Re: Tag 346", by Chris Cox
2006.10.16 22:18 "Re: Tag 346", by Toby Thain
2006.10.17 01:38 "Re: Tag 346", by Joris Van Damme
2006.10.17 11:41 "Re: Tag 346", by Leonard Rosenthol
2006.10.17 12:24 "Re: Tag 346", by Toby Thain
2006.10.17 13:15 "Re: Tag 346", by Leonard Rosenthol
2006.10.17 13:19 "Re: Tag 346", by Leonard Rosenthol
2006.10.17 13:27 "Re: Tag 346", by Ross Presser
2006.10.17 13:53 "Re: Tag 346", by Leonard Rosenthol
2006.10.17 13:17 "Re: Tag 346", by Ross Presser
2006.10.18 10:20 "Re: Tag 346", by Gerben Vos
2006.10.17 19:36 "Re: Tag 346", by Chris Cox

2006.10.16 21:47 "Re: Tag 346", by Ross Presser

Joris,

> Ross Presser wrote:
> > Is there any extant software anywhere that implements this, either for
> > writing or reading? (I have some hints that Pagemaker supported it at
> > some point.)
> >
> > Also, are there any sample images anywhere?
>
> To the best of my knowledge, that's a 'no' on both questions. I've never
> seen any file come my way that uses the Indexed tag. I can write it with
> my proprietary codec, but I'm careful to not let those experimental
> files escape into the wild and would not want to ship a version of my
> codec that writes them to anyone.
>
> I believe the design of the 'Indexed' tag is not without serious flaws.
> For one thing, it changes the meaning of the other most crucial tags.
[snippage]

Thanks for that information.  It certainly makes sense then; the tag
was proposed without having been fully thought out, so it never got
used.

The reason I asked is slightly off topic for TIFF, in fact. As you
probably know, the PDF spec does support Indexed images in any
colorspace defined in the PDF. In fact, the default profile for Adobe
Distiller will automatically convert *all* images in the source to
indexed images as long as the total color count is less than 256. This
can yield some terrific compression: the files in my workflow each
contain a single 8636x9144 pixel bitmap that uses only three colors --
black, white, and 100% magenta; the file sizes range from under a
megabyte to about three megabytes. It's perfect for this application.

But since there are apparently *zero* raster file formats that can
contain indexed CMYK images, it's impractical to do any image
manipulation on these bitmaps. Extracting them as full CMYK TIFFs
swells them to 100-315 mb.

I am considering writing a custom tool that converts them to RGB
palette on the fly, and back again. Since the colormap is so simple, I
can hardcode it into the tool and not worry about losing any color
information in either direction.

Thanks for your time.  I'll give up on the idea of using tag 346 then.