AWARE [SYSTEMS] Imaging expertise for the Delphi developer
AWare Systems, Imaging expertise for the Delphi developer, Home TIFF and LibTiff Mailing List Archive

LibTiff Mailing List

TIFF and LibTiff Mailing List Archive
July 2008

Previous Thread
Next Thread

Previous by Thread
Next by Thread

Previous by Date
Next by Date

Contact

The TIFF Mailing List Homepage
This list is run by Frank Warmerdam
Archive maintained by AWare Systems



Valid HTML 4.01!



Thread

2008.07.02 17:23 "BigTiff Support", by Alexander Johnson
2008.07.02 17:27 "BigTiff Support", by Alexander Johnson
2008.07.02 17:43 "Re: BigTiff Support", by Bob Friesenhahn
2008.07.02 18:07 "Re: BigTiff Support", by Edward Lam
2008.07.02 18:18 "Re: BigTiff Support", by Bob Friesenhahn
2008.07.02 18:47 "Re: BigTiff Support", by Edward Lam
2008.07.03 07:29 "Re: BigTiff Support", by Alexander Johnson
2008.07.03 14:58 "Re: eta for bigtiff support?", by Gary Mcgath
2008.07.03 15:26 "Re: eta for bigtiff support?", by Bob Friesenhahn
2008.07.03 15:28 "Re: eta for bigtiff support?", by Frank Warmerdam
2008.07.03 15:46 "Re: eta for bigtiff support?", by Gary Mcgath
2008.07.03 18:19 "Re: eta for bigtiff support?", by Stephen Carlsen
2008.07.10 21:07 "Re: eta for bigtiff support?", by Joris Van Damme
2008.07.10 21:50 "Re: eta for bigtiff support?", by Gary Mcgath
2008.07.10 23:17 "Re: eta for bigtiff support?", by Bob Friesenhahn
2008.07.10 23:25 "Re: eta for bigtiff support?", by Chris Cox
2008.07.11 00:36 "Re: eta for bigtiff support?", by Bob Friesenhahn
2008.07.11 00:38 "Re: eta for bigtiff support?", by Chris Cox
2008.07.11 12:56 "Re: eta for bigtiff support?", by Gary Mcgath
2008.07.11 16:34 "Re: eta for bigtiff support?", by Bob Friesenhahn
2008.07.11 13:25 "Re: eta for bigtiff support?", by Edward Lam
2008.07.02 17:32 "BigTiff Support", by Alexander Johnson

2008.07.03 15:26 "Re: eta for bigtiff support?", by Bob Friesenhahn

On Thu, 3 Jul 2008, Gary McGath wrote:
>
>> This is a proposal, not a specification. Don't go implementing it just 
>> yet and releasing your code to the public, it has not yet been approved
>> and is liable to change. You don't want to be the one whose files turn
>> out invalid in 6 months from now.

This text was written long before Aware Systems worked to develop 
BigTIFF support for libtiff.

> It shouldn't be surprising that people aren't jumping in to test 
> when the definition of BigTIFF is still in flux, and has shown no 
> sign of approaching a stable specification.

Given your title, I see that you should be justified in being 
apprehensive.  There were quite a few people involved with developing 
the BigTIFF draft specification, including people from Adobe.  There 
have been no changes since that time.  There are at least two 
implementations.  BigTIFF is a small natural progression from TIFF. 
It seems unlikely that an organization with some apparent position of 
authority (i.e. a standards organization or Adobe) will produce a 
document on their own.  Perhaps an IETF RFC is the best avenue since 
the IETF has already published several TIFF-related RFCs.

Bob
======================================
Bob Friesenhahn
bfriesen@simple.dallas.tx.us, http://www.simplesystems.org/users/bfriesen/
GraphicsMagick Maintainer,    http://www.GraphicsMagick.org/