AWARE SYSTEMS
TIFF and LibTiff Mail List Archive

Thread

2011.12.12 20:22 "[Tiff] considering packaging 4.0 beta in debian "unstable"", by Jay Berkenbilt
2011.12.12 20:33 "Re: [Tiff] considering packaging 4.0 beta in debian "unstable"", by Bob Friesenhahn
2011.12.12 21:26 "Re: [Tiff] considering packaging 4.0 beta in debian "unstable"", by Jay Berkenbilt
2011.12.12 23:49 "Re: [Tiff] considering packaging 4.0 beta in debian "unstable"", by Chris Cox
2011.12.13 00:16 "Re: [Tiff] considering packaging 4.0 beta in debian "unstable"", by Bob Friesenhahn
2011.12.13 00:29 "Re: [Tiff] considering packaging 4.0 beta in debian "unstable"", by Frank Warmerdam
2011.12.13 01:13 "Re: [Tiff] considering packaging 4.0 beta in debian "unstable"", by Lee Howard
2011.12.13 14:42 "Re: [Tiff] considering packaging 4.0 beta in debian "unstable"", by Olivier Paquet
2011.12.13 02:06 "Re: [Tiff] considering packaging 4.0 beta in debian "unstable"", by Bob Friesenhahn
2011.12.14 21:35 "Re: [Tiff] considering packaging 4.0 beta in debian "unstable"", by Jay Berkenbilt

2011.12.13 14:42 "Re: [Tiff] considering packaging 4.0 beta in debian "unstable"", by Olivier Paquet

On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 8:13 PM, Lee Howard <faxguy@howardsilvan.com> wrote: > Thumbs-up from me, too, on 4.0.0 as-is.  I've been using it on my

development system for about a year now, and I'm happy with it.

Same here. We've been shipping it with our software for two years and have only had a few minor issues which were fixed. I don't think there are any "absolutely must fix" problems holding up a 4.0.0 release at this point.

Olivier