Thread

2002.08.20 07:31 "memory allocation", by Peter Majer

2002.08.20 16:13 "RE: memory allocation", by Roger Bedell

2002.08.20 20:48 "OT: large memory allocation in Windows", by Dante Allegria

2002.08.21 08:34 "Re: OT: large memory allocation in Windows", by Rob van den Tillaart

2002.08.21 11:30 "Re: OT: large memory allocation in Windows", by Peter Majer

2002.08.21 13:47 "Re: OT: large memory allocation in Windows", by Rob van den Tillaart

2002.08.21 16:05 "Re: OT: large memory allocation in Windows", by Bob Friesenhahn

2002.08.21 20:47 "Re: OT: large memory allocation in Windows", by Peter Nielsen

2002.08.22 08:33 "Re: OT: large memory allocation in Windows", by Andreas R. Kleinert

2002.08.22 15:30 "RE: OT: large memory allocation in Windows", by Roger Bedell

2002.08.22 16:29 "Re: OT: large memory allocation in Windows", by Chris 'Xenon' Hanson

2002.08.22 17:20 "RE: OT: large memory allocation in Windows", by Roger Bedell

2002.08.22 17:46 "RE: OT: large memory allocation in Windows", by Dante Allegria

2002.08.22 17:33 "Re: OT: large memory allocation in Windows", by Peter Montgomery

2002.08.22 18:45 "Re: OT: large memory allocation in Windows", by Chris 'Xenon' Hanson

2002.08.22 21:19 "Re: OT: large memory allocation in Windows", by Peter Montgomery

2002.09.01 17:14 "Re: OT: large memory allocation in Windows", by Peter Montgomery

2002.09.05 17:00 "Re: OT: large memory allocation in Windows", by Andreas R. Kleinert

2002.09.05 17:03 "Re: OT: large memory allocation in Windows", by Peter Montgomery

2002.08.22 15:59 "RE: OT: large memory allocation in Windows", by Ed Grissom

2002.08.22 22:09 "RE: OT: large memory allocation in Windows", by Andreas R. Kleinert

2002.08.21 11:48 "Re: OT: large memory allocation in Windows", by Peter Nielsen

2002.08.22 18:00 "Re: OT: large memory allocation in Windows", by Bob Friesenhahn

2002.08.22 18:18 "Re: OT: large memory allocation in Windows", by Peter Montgomery

2002.09.05 17:03 "Re: OT: large memory allocation in Windows", by Peter Montgomery

Andreas,

Now I'm curious how this will influence the Itanium port ;-)

As a random guess, I would assume that the memory map will have a hole in it from the 2GB to 4 GB range, much as Windows has a 384 KB hole in it from 640KB to 1 MB to allow for DOS compatibility. Just a guess.

Thanks,
PeterM