AWARE SYSTEMS
TIFF and LibTiff Mail List Archive

Thread

2007.10.22 17:40 "[Tiff] bad version number 10752", by Kai-Uwe Behrmann
2007.10.22 18:31 "Re: [Tiff] bad version number 10752", by Bob Friesenhahn
2007.10.22 18:50 "Re: [Tiff] bad version number 10752", by Kai-Uwe Behrmann
2007.10.22 18:57 "Re: [Tiff] bad version number 10752", by Bob Friesenhahn
2007.10.23 15:05 "Re: [Tiff] bad version number 10752", by Kai-Uwe Behrmann
2007.10.23 15:45 "Re: [Tiff] bad version number 10752", by Bob Friesenhahn
2007.10.22 20:07 "Re: [Tiff] bad version number 10752", by Toby Thain
2007.10.23 02:33 "Re: [Tiff] bad version number 10752", by Graeme Gill
2007.10.23 06:28 "Re: [Tiff] bad version number 10752", by Kai-Uwe Behrmann
2007.10.23 07:41 "Re: [Tiff] bad version number 10752", by Graeme Gill
2007.10.23 08:10 "Re: [Tiff] bad version number 10752", by John

2007.10.23 15:45 "Re: [Tiff] bad version number 10752", by Bob Friesenhahn

Here is what Mike Sweet suggests:

http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/cairo/2006-October/008292.html

Using platform specific defines seems really ugly to me. This approach does not stand the test of time.

There are other ugly approaches based on platform specific defines but given the design of libtiff, I like your previous patch better.

Bob
======================================
Bob Friesenhahn
bfriesen@simple.dallas.tx.us, http://www.simplesystems.org/users/bfriesen/
GraphicsMagick Maintainer, http://www.GraphicsMagick.org/