| AWARE [SYSTEMS] | Imaging expertise for the Delphi developer | |||||||
![]() |
TIFF and LibTiff Mailing List Archive | |||||||
LibTiff Mailing List
TIFF and LibTiff Mailing List Archive Contact
The TIFF Mailing List Homepage |
Thread2006.09.26 11:56 "Re: Status of ISO JBIG and CIELAB JPEG support", by A Wandering Libtiff UserQuoting Jean-Yves Le Ridant <jean-yves.leridant@culture.gouv.fr>: > This lack of reference reader/writer/viewver is why I said to Joris > about trying ICCLAB ( I understand that ITULAB is "great"). Are these standards too new to be adequately documented? Are they controlled by patent-enforcing companies which are aggressive litigators? I DID try to find some reference images as well as a complete specification, but didn't find much at all. > The difference being only in the ab rescaling, > from a codec point of view, the process is the same. Understood. > And photoshop for exemple, perfectly load and display ICCLAB > jpegintiff files, with various subsamplings. > But only 8 bits depth ... :-((( Ouch. Adobe is usually pretty good about supporting formats, at least with decoding them. > I have some I can place somewhere in cyberspace. Excellent, excellent. Merci beaucoup, mon ami généreux. > a "jpegintiff CIELAB affair" for any purpose other that what > PhotoShop can do ( in turn save a monochrome file with a well > defined calibrated L grayscale ) is basically ... hazardous. I understand. It seems that the standard is too new and emergent to be very useful outside a very limited scope. I'm puzzled as to why it was embraced and adopted by the facsimile hardware vendors. Designing a "modern" facsimile system without computer-based documents management and processing firmly in mind seems mentally deranged. =R= |
|||||||