AWARE [SYSTEMS] Imaging expertise for the Delphi developer
AWare Systems, Imaging expertise for the Delphi developer, Home TIFF and LibTiff Mailing List Archive

LibTiff Mailing List

TIFF and LibTiff Mailing List Archive
January 2007

Previous Thread
Next Thread

Previous by Thread
Next by Thread

Previous by Date
Next by Date

Contact

The TIFF Mailing List Homepage
This list is run by Frank Warmerdam
Archive maintained by AWare Systems



Valid HTML 4.01!



Thread

2007.01.17 02:25 "Elevation Data", by Craig Bruce
2007.01.17 02:57 "Re: Elevation Data", by Bob Friesenhahn
2007.01.17 08:07 "Re: Elevation Data", by Joris Van Damme
2007.01.17 15:24 "Re: Elevation Data", by Ed Grissom
2007.01.17 15:55 "Re: Elevation Data", by Joris Van Damme
2007.01.17 16:03 "Re: Elevation Data", by Ed Grissom
2007.01.17 16:20 "Re: Elevation Data", by Joris Van Damme
2007.01.17 16:52 "Re: Elevation Data", by Ed Grissom
2007.01.17 17:20 "Re: Elevation Data", by Joris Van Damme
2007.01.17 19:26 "Re: Elevation Data", by Ed Grissom
2007.01.17 20:22 "Re: Elevation Data", by Joris Van Damme
2007.01.17 20:52 "Re: Elevation Data", by Joris Van Damme
2007.01.17 21:00 "Re: Elevation Data", by Bob Friesenhahn
2007.01.17 21:58 "Re: Elevation Data", by Joris Van Damme
2007.01.17 22:18 "Re: Elevation Data", by Bob Friesenhahn
2007.01.18 11:09 "Re: Elevation Data", by Andrey Kiselev
2007.01.17 20:00 "Re: Elevation Data", by Craig Bruce
2007.01.17 17:01 "Re: Elevation Data", by Bob Friesenhahn
2007.01.17 18:35 "Re: Elevation Data", by Joris Van Damme
2007.01.17 21:08 "Re: Elevation Data", by Frank Warmerdam
2007.01.17 19:27 "Re: Elevation Data", by Frank Warmerdam
2007.01.17 16:08 "Re: Elevation Data", by Bob Friesenhahn
2007.01.17 16:30 "Re: Elevation Data", by Joris Van Damme
2007.01.17 19:03 "Re: Elevation Data", by Frank Warmerdam
2007.01.17 17:28 "Re: Elevation Data", by Joris Van Damme
2007.01.17 21:18 "Re: Elevation Data", by Frank Warmerdam
2007.01.17 16:51 "Re: Elevation Data", by Gerben Vos
2007.01.17 18:03 "Re: Elevation Data", by Joris Van Damme
2007.01.17 16:27 "Re: Elevation Data", by Frank Warmerdam
2007.01.17 19:00 "Re: Elevation Data", by Joris Van Damme
2007.01.17 21:51 "Re: Elevation Data", by Frank Warmerdam
2007.01.17 03:35 "Re: Elevation Data", by Frank Warmerdam
2007.01.17 08:00 "Re: Elevation Data", by Joris Van Damme
2007.01.17 20:07 "Re: Elevation Data", by Joris Van Damme

2007.01.17 18:03 "Re: Elevation Data", by Joris Van Damme

Gerben,

Gerben Vos wrote:
> It seems to me Craig's data doesn't really have a photometric
> interpretation, since it isn't really an image. So he should just use
> something reasonable (min-is-black I would say), and use SampleFormat
> to indicate what the data really means.

I am confused about this. If we're talking about an ExtraSample, then
clearly there is more freedom, but if the data is encoded in a main
image color channel, covered by any photometric at all, we need to be
consistent with the normal usage and the encoding that applies.
Grayscale data, be it MinOrBlack or MinOrWhite, is grayscale data, and
you may know it's elevation but if you write it as grayscale data, it's
grayscale data. So the needs of renderers, and the encoding of
grayscale, do come into play.

> As for SMin/MaxSampleValue, Joris wrote:
>
> > If the spec were clear and binding on this, maybe things would have
> > been different. But it isn't.
>
> I don't see where the TIFF6 spec says they're just statistical. It
> doesn't specify sanctions for when they're wrong, but the text seems
> quite clear that if the tags are present, they are to contain the
> real bottom and top of the value range. An application rejecting a
> TIFF because it finds a sample value outside the defined range would
> be in its right based on the text.

You're absolutely correct. Ed pointed this out already. I was confusing
my memory of Min/MaxSampleValue tags with SMin/SMaxSampleValue tags. I
stand corrected.

So that leads me to think my proposal for a recommendation as specified
in http://www.asmail.be/msg0055261416.html
a) agrees with the spec
b) agrees with needs like elevation encoding
c) agrees with graphic rendering needs

Would you agree?


Best regards,

Joris Van Damme
info@awaresystems.be
http://www.awaresystems.be/
Download your free TIFF tag viewer for windows here:
http://www.awaresystems.be/imaging/tiff/astifftagviewer.html