Thread

2001.04.26 14:40 "8K chunks for RowsPerStrip?", by Michael O'Rourke

2001.04.26 16:13 "RE: 8K chunks for RowsPerStrip?", by Max Martinez

2001.04.26 16:45 "RE: 8K chunks for RowsPerStrip?", by Don Swatman

2001.04.26 18:12 "RE: 8K chunks for RowsPerStrip?", by Ed Grissom

2001.04.26 18:39 "Re: 8K chunks for RowsPerStrip?", by Frank Warmerdam

2001.04.26 16:47 "Re: 8K chunks for RowsPerStrip?", by Bernd Stahlbock

2001.04.26 17:19 "Re: 8K chunks for RowsPerStrip?", by Daniel McCoy

2001.04.26 18:34 "8K chunks for RowsPerStrip?", by Chris Barker

2001.04.26 18:48 "RE: 8K chunks for RowsPerStrip? - Image size limits", by Peter Smith

2001.04.26 16:47 "Re: 8K chunks for RowsPerStrip?", by Bernd Stahlbock

Does this standard still apply? I end up seeing _lots_ of TIFF files that write out one strip. Seems like this standard/suggestion (per Section 7 of the spec) was probably meant more for days when machines didn't have much ram and swap space.

We have files over 2GB size, I really don't want them in one strip. Even the smallest with 100-200MB are really annoying (as single strip), because processing has to wait until the whole file is decoded to memory.

Bernd

stahlbock@basysprint.de, http://www.basysprint.de
basysPrint GmbH, Guelzer Str. 15, 19258 Boizenburg, Germany
Tel.: ++49-38847-99-150, Fax:++49-38847-99-192