2000.10.05 00:20 "Old-style JPEG and HP 9100C Digital Sender", by Tim Bell
-
2000.10.05 03:39 "Re: Old-style JPEG and HP 9100C Digital Sender", by Niles Ritter
-
2000.10.05 19:43 "Re: Old-style JPEG and HP 9100C Digital Sender", by Rex Jolliff
-
2000.10.06 02:20 "Re: Old-style JPEG and HP 9100C Digital Sender", by Tom Lane
- 2000.10.06 04:14 "Re: Old-style JPEG and HP 9100C Digital Sender", by Raj Kumar S.
-
2000.10.06 09:36 "Re: Old-style JPEG and HP 9100C Digital Sender", by Joris Van Damme
-
2000.10.06 13:50 "Re: Old-style JPEG and HP 9100C Digital Sender", by Frank Warmerdam
-
2000.10.06 13:31 "RE: Old-style JPEG and HP 9100C Digital Sender", by Ed Grissom
- 2000.10.06 14:21 "RE: Old-style JPEG and HP 9100C Digital Sender", by Martin Bailey
- 2000.10.06 15:07 "PDF is NOT proprietary!", by Leonard Rosenthol
- 2000.10.06 17:56 "Re: Old-style JPEG and HP 9100C Digital Sender", by Joris Van Damme
-
2000.10.06 13:31 "RE: Old-style JPEG and HP 9100C Digital Sender", by Ed Grissom
-
2000.10.06 13:50 "Re: Old-style JPEG and HP 9100C Digital Sender", by Frank Warmerdam
- 2000.10.06 10:36 "Re: Old-style JPEG and HP 9100C Digital Sender", by Martin Bailey
- 2000.10.07 06:03 "Re: Old-style JPEG and HP 9100C Digital Sender", by Joris Van Damme
-
2000.10.06 02:20 "Re: Old-style JPEG and HP 9100C Digital Sender", by Tom Lane
-
2000.10.05 19:43 "Re: Old-style JPEG and HP 9100C Digital Sender", by Rex Jolliff
2000.10.06 14:44 "RE: Old-style JPEG and HP 9100C Digital Sender", by Ed Grissom
Transparent Value (not a mask)Yes to both
"No Data" value
??
It has been pointed out to me that these two (TransparencyValue/NODATAValue) are essentially the same. Graphics Arts folks want transparency whereas Remote Sensing types say "we did not collect data for this point in the grid". Also, when images are warped from one projection to another, it is very likely that there are edge pixels that do not map to anything in the original image and should be recorded as "NO DATA" for this position.
ed grissom
egrissom@ziimaging.com